Assetion : Light converges on a virtual object.
Reason : Virtual object is always behind a mirror.

Options

A. (a) If both Assertion and Reason are true and the Reason is correct explanation of the Assertion.
B. (b) If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
C. (c) If Assertion is true, but the Reason is false.
D. (d) If Assertion is false but the Reason is true.

Answer

To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we can break it down step by step.

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion
The assertion states that "Light converges on a virtual object."
- A virtual object is a point from which light rays appear to diverge after reflection or refraction. In the context of mirrors, a virtual object is formed when the light rays seem to originate from a point behind the mirror.

### Step 2: Understand the Reason
The reason states that "A virtual object is always behind a mirror."
- This is true because, in the case of a plane mirror or a concave mirror, the virtual object is considered to be behind the mirror. The light rays that are reflected appear to come from a location behind the mirror.

### Step 3: Analyze the Relationship Between Assertion and Reason
- The assertion is true as light can indeed converge on a virtual object. However, the reason provided is also true, but it does not provide a direct explanation for the assertion. The assertion is about the convergence of light on a virtual object, while the reason simply states the location of the virtual object.

### Step 4: Conclusion
Both the assertion and the reason are true statements, but the reason does not correctly explain the assertion. Therefore, the correct answer is that both statements are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Answer
Both the assertion and the reason are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation for the assertion.

---