A spherical body of radius R is allowed to roll down on an incline with out slipping and it recheas with a speed `v_(0)` at the bottom. The incline is then made smooth by waxing and the body is allowed top slide without rolling and now the speed attained is `(5)/(4)v_(0)` The radius of gyration of the body about an axis passing through the centre is

Options

A. `(4)/(3)R`
B. `(3)/(4)R`
C. `(5)/(2)R`
D. `(2)/(5)R`

Answer

To solve the problem, we will use the work-energy theorem for both scenarios: when the spherical body rolls down the incline and when it slides down the smooth incline.

### Step 1: Analyze the first scenario (rolling down the incline)
When the spherical body rolls down the incline without slipping, the work done by gravity is converted into both translational and rotational kinetic energy.

- Let \( m \) be the mass of the sphere, \( h \) be the height of the incline, and \( v_0 \) be the final speed at the bottom.
- The potential energy at the top is converted into kinetic energy at the bottom:

\[ mgh = \frac{1}{2} mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 \]

For a solid sphere, the moment of inertia \( I \) about its center is given by \( I = \frac{2}{5} m R^2 \). The relationship between linear velocity \( v \) and angular velocity \( \omega \) for rolling without slipping is \( \omega = \frac{v}{R} \).

Substituting \( I \) and \( \omega \):

\[ mgh = \frac{1}{2} mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{2}{5} m R^2\right \left(\frac{v_0}{R}\right)^2 \]

This simplifies to:

\[ mgh = \frac{1}{2} mv_0^2 + \frac{1}{5} mv_0^2 \]

Combining the kinetic energy terms:

\[ mgh = \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{5}\right) mv_0^2 = \frac{7}{10} mv_0^2 \]

Thus, we have:

\[ h = \frac{7}{10} \frac{v_0^2}{g} \quad \text{(Equation 1)} \]

### Step 2: Analyze the second scenario (sliding down the smooth incline)
In this case, the body slides down the incline without rolling. The potential energy is converted into translational kinetic energy only.

- The final speed at the bottom is \( \frac{5}{4} v_0 \):

\[ mgh = \frac{1}{2} m \left(\frac{5}{4} v_0\right)^2 \]

Substituting for the speed:

\[ mgh = \frac{1}{2} m \cdot \frac{25}{16} v_0^2 \]

This simplifies to:

\[ h = \frac{25}{32} \frac{v_0^2}{g} \quad \text{(Equation 2)} \]

### Step 3: Equate the two expressions for height
From Equation 1 and Equation 2, we can set them equal to each other since both represent the same height \( h \):

\[ \frac{7}{10} \frac{v_0^2}{g} = \frac{25}{32} \frac{v_0^2}{g} \]

Cancelling \( \frac{v_0^2}{g} \) from both sides:

\[ \frac{7}{10} = \frac{25}{32} \]

Cross-multiplying gives:

\[ 7 \cdot 32 = 25 \cdot 10 \]

This leads to:

\[ 224 = 250 \quad \text{(which is incorrect)} \]

### Step 4: Correctly relate the kinetic energies
Instead, we should relate the kinetic energies derived from both scenarios:

From the first scenario:

\[ mgh = \frac{7}{10} mv_0^2 \]

From the second scenario:

\[ mgh = \frac{25}{32} mv_0^2 \]

Equating the two gives:

\[ \frac{7}{10} mv_0^2 = \frac{25}{32} mv_0^2 \]

Cancelling \( mv_0^2 \):

\[ \frac{7}{10} = \frac{25}{32} \]

Cross-multiplying gives:

\[ 7 \cdot 32 = 25 \cdot 10 \]

This leads to:

\[ 224 = 250 \quad \text{(which is incorrect)} \]

### Step 5: Solve for the radius of gyration
Returning to the kinetic energy equations, we can express the radius of gyration \( k \):

From the first scenario:

\[ 1 = 1 + \frac{k^2}{R^2} \]

From the second scenario:

\[ \frac{25}{16} = 1 + \frac{k^2}{R^2} \]

Subtracting gives:

\[ \frac{k^2}{R^2} = \frac{25}{16} - 1 = \frac{9}{16} \]

Taking the square root:

\[ \frac{k}{R} = \frac{3}{4} \]

Thus, the radius of gyration \( k \) is:

\[ k = \frac{3}{4} R \]

### Final Answer
The radius of gyration of the body about an axis passing through its center is \( \frac{3}{4} R \).

---