Assertion: - `overset(*) (CH_3 )` acts as an electrophile.
Reason :-The carbon atom in `overset(*)(CH_3)` is in a state of `sp^2` hybridisation.

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT and Reason is the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.
B. If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT but Reason is not the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.
C. If Assertion is CORRECT but Reason is INCORRECT.
D. If Assertion is INCORRECT but Reason is CORRECT.

Explanation

To solve the question, we will analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
The assertion states that `CH3·` (methyl radical) acts as an electrophile. An electrophile is a species that is electron-deficient and can accept electrons.

- **Evaluation**: The methyl radical `CH3·` has an unpaired electron, which makes it a radical, but it does not have a positive charge nor is it electron-deficient in the sense required for electrophiles. Therefore, the assertion is **incorrect**.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states that the carbon atom in `CH3·` is in a state of `sp^2` hybridization.

- **Evaluation**: In the methyl radical `CH3·`, the carbon atom is bonded to three hydrogen atoms and has one unpaired electron in a p orbital. The three bonds to hydrogen are formed using `sp^2` hybrid orbitals, and the unpaired electron occupies a p orbital. Therefore, this statement is **correct**.

### Step 3: Conclusion
Based on the evaluations:
- The assertion is incorrect.
- The reason is correct.

Thus, the correct option is that the assertion is incorrect, but the reason is correct.

### Final Answer
The correct option is: **Assertion is incorrect, but reason is correct.**

---