Assertion :-Structures `: overset(* * )(N^(-)) = overset(+ )N = overset(* *)O: and : overset(* *)(N^(-)) = overset(* * )O = overset(+ )N:`
can not be regarded as the canonical forms of `N_2 O` resonance hybrid.
Reason :-The two structures involve a change in the relative positions of atoms.
(a)If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT and Reason is the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion
(b)If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT but Reason is not the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.
(c)If Assertion is CORRECT but Reason is INCORRECT.
(d)If Assertion is INCORRECT but Reason is CORRECT.

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT and Reason is the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion
B. If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT but Reason is not the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.
C. If Assertion is CORRECT but Reason is INCORRECT.
D. If Assertion is INCORRECT but Reason is CORRECT.

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**:
The assertion states that the structures given (with charges and bonds) cannot be regarded as canonical forms of the resonance hybrid of \( N_2O \).
- **Reasoning**: For structures to be considered canonical forms, the position of the atoms must remain the same while the positions of electrons can change. In the given structures, the positions of the atoms have changed.

2. **Understanding the Reason**:
The reason states that the two structures involve a change in the relative positions of atoms.
- **Reasoning**: This statement is true because if the positions of the atoms change, then the structures cannot be canonical forms of the same molecule.

3. **Evaluating the Assertion**:
Since the assertion correctly identifies that the structures cannot be canonical forms due to the change in atomic positions, it is correct.

4. **Evaluating the Reason**:
The reason accurately describes why the assertion is true, as it highlights the change in atomic positions.

5. **Conclusion**:
Both the assertion and the reason are correct, and the reason is indeed the correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Answer:
(a) If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT and Reason is the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.

---