Assertion : Schizocarpic fruits are intermediate between dehiscent and indehiscent fruits .
Reason : These fruits split into single seeded parts .

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are true and the Rea-son is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
B. If both Assertion and Reason are true and the Rea-son is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
C. If Assertion is true, but Reason is false.
D. If both Assertion and Reason is false.

Answer

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Terms**:
- **Dehiscent Fruits**: These are fruits that open at maturity to release seeds. Examples include peas and beans.
- **Indehiscent Fruits**: These fruits do not open at maturity and retain their seeds inside. Examples include nuts and grains.
- **Schizocarpic Fruits**: These are a type of fruit that is intermediate between dehiscent and indehiscent fruits. They split into segments or compartments, each containing one or more seeds.

2. **Analyzing the Assertion**:
- The assertion states that "Schizocarpic fruits are intermediate between dehiscent and indehiscent fruits." This is correct because schizocarpic fruits do exhibit characteristics of both types. They do not fully open like dehiscent fruits but do split into parts.

3. **Analyzing the Reason**:
- The reason provided is "These fruits split into single-seeded parts." This is also correct. Schizocarpic fruits do split into segments, and each segment can contain a single seed.

4. **Connecting Assertion and Reason**:
- The reason explains how schizocarpic fruits function, thereby justifying the assertion. Since they split into parts, they are indeed intermediate between the two categories of fruits.

5. **Conclusion**:
- Both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion. Therefore, the answer is that both statements are correct, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

### Final Answer:
Both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

---