Assertion : Batesian mimicry is a form of mimicry in which can edible species resembles an inedible one.
Reason : Batesian mimicry is a form of protective mimicry.

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are true and the Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion, then mark (1)
B. If both Assertion and Reason are true ,but the Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion, then mark (2).
C. If Assertion is true, but Reason is false , then mark (3)
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false. , then mark (4)

Answer

**Step-by-Step Solution:**

1. **Understanding the Assertion**: The assertion states that "Batesian mimicry is a form of mimicry in which an edible species resembles an inedible one." To analyze this, we need to identify what Batesian mimicry is.

2. **Defining Batesian Mimicry**: Batesian mimicry is a type of mimicry where a harmless or edible species (the mimic) evolves to resemble a harmful or inedible species (the model). This resemblance helps the edible species avoid predation because predators mistake it for the harmful species.

3. **Evaluating the Assertion**: The assertion correctly describes Batesian mimicry. The edible species (the mimic) resembles the inedible species (the model), which is accurate according to the definition of Batesian mimicry.

4. **Understanding the Reason**: The reason states that "Batesian mimicry is a form of protective mimicry." Protective mimicry refers to adaptations that help an organism avoid predation.

5. **Evaluating the Reason**: The reason is also correct. Batesian mimicry serves as a protective mechanism for the edible species by allowing it to avoid being eaten by predators.

6. **Assessing the Relationship**: While both the assertion and reason are true, the reason does not provide a complete explanation of the assertion. The reason does not specify how the mimicry works in terms of predator perception and the evolutionary advantage it provides.

7. **Conclusion**: Therefore, the correct answer to the question is that both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

**Final Answer**: The correct option is 2: Both assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

---