Assertion: Live attenuated vaccine is better in terms of immunity provided to the recipient.
Reason: As secondary lymphoid organs, exampe peyer's patches, are stimulated to protect the society.

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion, then mark (1).
B. If both Assertin and Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion, then mark (20.
C. If Assertion is true but Reason is false, then mark (3).
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false. Then mark (4).

Answer

**Step-by-Step Text Solution:**

1. **Understanding the Assertion**: The assertion states that "Live attenuated vaccine is better in terms of immunity provided to the recipient." This means that vaccines made from weakened forms of pathogens (viruses or bacteria) are more effective in stimulating the immune system compared to other types of vaccines.

2. **Defining Live Attenuated Vaccines**: Live attenuated vaccines contain live pathogens that have been weakened so they cannot cause disease. This allows the immune system to recognize and respond to the pathogen without the risk of causing illness.

3. **Mechanism of Action**: When a live attenuated vaccine is administered, it stimulates a strong immune response. The immune system recognizes the weakened pathogen and produces antibodies and memory cells, which provide long-lasting immunity against future infections by the actual pathogen.

4. **Understanding the Reason**: The reason provided states that "As secondary lymphoid organs, example Peyer's patches, are stimulated to protect the society." Peyer's patches are clusters of lymphoid tissue found in the small intestine that play a role in monitoring intestinal bacteria and preventing pathogenic growth.

5. **Evaluating the Reason**: While Peyer's patches are indeed important for immune function in the gut, the assertion about live attenuated vaccines being better in terms of immunity is not directly explained by the stimulation of Peyer's patches. The effectiveness of live attenuated vaccines is due to their ability to induce a robust immune response, not specifically because of Peyer's patches.

6. **Conclusion**: Both the assertion and the reason are true statements. However, the reason does not correctly explain why live attenuated vaccines are better in terms of immunity. Therefore, the correct answer is that both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation for the assertion.

**Final Answer**: Both assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation for the assertion.

---