Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
Statement I: While calculating intensiti...

Statement I: While calculating intensities in interference pattern, we can add the intensities of the individual waves.
Statement II: Principle of superposition is valid for liner waves.

A

Statement I is True, statement II is True, Statement II is a correct explanation for Statement I.

B

Statement I is Ture, Statement II is Ture, Statement II is NOT a correct explanation for Statement I.

C

Statement I is True, Statement II is False.

D

Statement I is False, Statement II is True.

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To analyze the given statements, we will break down the reasoning step by step: ### Step 1: Understanding Statement II - **Statement II** states that the principle of superposition is valid for linear waves. - The principle of superposition states that when two or more waves overlap, the resultant displacement at any point is the sum of the displacements of the individual waves. - This principle holds true only for linear waves, where the relationship between the amplitude and the resultant wave is linear. **Conclusion for Step 1**: Statement II is correct. ### Step 2: Understanding Statement I - **Statement I** claims that while calculating intensities in an interference pattern, we can add the intensities of the individual waves. - Intensity (I) is defined as proportional to the square of the amplitude (A) of the wave: \( I \propto A^2 \). - If we have two waves with amplitudes \( A_1 \) and \( A_2 \), their intensities would be \( I_1 \propto A_1^2 \) and \( I_2 \propto A_2^2 \). - When we add the amplitudes of the two waves (assuming they interfere constructively), the resultant amplitude \( A_R \) is given by \( A_R = A_1 + A_2 \). - The intensity of the resultant wave is then \( I_R \propto (A_1 + A_2)^2 \), which expands to \( I_R \propto A_1^2 + A_2^2 + 2A_1A_2 \). - This shows that we cannot simply add the intensities \( I_1 + I_2 \) because the cross term \( 2A_1A_2 \) is present in the resultant intensity. **Conclusion for Step 2**: Statement I is incorrect. ### Final Conclusion - **Statement I** is incorrect because intensities cannot be added directly; they depend on the square of the amplitudes. - **Statement II** is correct as the principle of superposition applies only to linear waves. ### Summary - Statement I: Incorrect - Statement II: Correct

To analyze the given statements, we will break down the reasoning step by step: ### Step 1: Understanding Statement II - **Statement II** states that the principle of superposition is valid for linear waves. - The principle of superposition states that when two or more waves overlap, the resultant displacement at any point is the sum of the displacements of the individual waves. - This principle holds true only for linear waves, where the relationship between the amplitude and the resultant wave is linear. **Conclusion for Step 1**: Statement II is correct. ...
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • WAVE OPTICS

    CENGAGE PHYSICS ENGLISH|Exercise Linked Comprehension|88 Videos
  • WAVE OPTICS

    CENGAGE PHYSICS ENGLISH|Exercise Integer|3 Videos
  • WAVE OPTICS

    CENGAGE PHYSICS ENGLISH|Exercise Multiple Correct|8 Videos
  • SOURCES OF MAGNETIC FIELD

    CENGAGE PHYSICS ENGLISH|Exercise single correct Ansewer type|12 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Can we apply the principle of superposition to both types of waves ?

Statement-I : In Young's double slit experiment interference pattern dissappears when one of the slits is closed Statement-II : Interference is observed due to superposition of light waves from two coherent source

Statement-I : In Young's double slit experiment interference pattern dissappears when one of the slits is closed Statement-II : Interference is observed due to superposition of light waves from two coherent source

Statement I: For the situation shown in figure two identecal coherent light sources produce interference pattern on the screen. The intensity of minima nearest to S_(1) is not exactly zero. Statement II: Minimum intensity is zero, when interfering waves have same intensity at the location of superposition.

The intensity of interference waves in an interference pattern is same as I_(0) . The resultant intensity at any point of observation will be

When two coherent waves interfere, the minimum and maximum intensities are in the ratio 16 : 25. Then a) the maximum and minimum amplitudes will be in the ratio 5 : 4 b) the amplitudes of the individual waves will be in the ratio 9 : 1 c) the intensities of the individual waves will be in the ratio 41 : 9 d) the intensities of the individual waves will be in the ratio 81 : 1.

Statement I: In YDSE, if separation between the slits is less than wavelength of light, then no interference pattern can be observed. Statement II: For interference pattern to be observed, light sources have to be coherent.

Statement I : When a guitar string is plucked , the frequency of the plucked string will not be the same as the wave it produces in air . Statement II : The speeds of the waves depend on the medium in whhich they are propagating.

Statement I: In calculating the disturbance produced by a pair of superimposed incoherent wave trians, you can add their intensities. Statement II: I_(1) + I_(2) + 2 sqrt(I_(1) I_(2)) cos delta . The average value of cos delta = 0 for incoherent waves.

statement I: The intensity of a plane progressive wave does not change with change in distance from the source. Statement II: The wavefronts associated with a plane progressive wave are planar.