Why don't we observe the wave properties of large objects such as a cricket ball?

Explanation

To understand why we don't observe the wave properties of large objects such as a cricket ball, we can follow these steps:

### Step 1: Understand de Broglie's Hypothesis
According to de Broglie's hypothesis, every moving particle or body has an associated wavelength (λ), which can be calculated using the formula:
\[ \lambda = \frac{H}{mv} \]
where:
- \( H \) is Planck's constant (\( 6.63 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js} \)),
- \( m \) is the mass of the particle,
- \( v \) is the velocity of the particle.

### Step 2: Determine the Mass and Velocity of a Cricket Ball
Let's consider a typical cricket ball:
- Mass (\( m \)) = 100 grams = \( 0.1 \, \text{kg} \)
- Maximum velocity (\( v \)) = 50 meters per second.

### Step 3: Substitute Values into the de Broglie Equation
Now, we can substitute the values of \( H \), \( m \), and \( v \) into the de Broglie equation:
\[ \lambda = \frac{6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{0.1 \times 50} \]

### Step 4: Calculate the Wavelength
Now, we perform the calculation:
\[ \lambda = \frac{6.63 \times 10^{-34}}{5} \]
\[ \lambda = 1.326 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{meters} \]

### Step 5: Analyze the Result
The calculated wavelength (\( 1.32 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{meters} \)) is extremely small. Such a tiny wavelength is far beyond the detection capabilities of any current measuring instruments or detectors.

### Step 6: Conclusion
Due to the extremely small wavelength associated with large objects like a cricket ball, we do not observe their wave properties. In contrast, microscopic particles like electrons, which have much smaller mass and can have relatively higher velocities, exhibit detectable wave properties.

---