Assertion Carbon tetrachloride dose not form a precipitate of `AgCI` with `AgNO_(3)` solution
Reasoning Carbon tetrachloride is a liquid.

Options

A. If both `(A)` and `(R )` are correct and `(R )` is the correct explanation of `(A)`
B. If both `(A)` and `(R )` are correct and `(R )` is not the correct explanation of `(A)`
C. If `(A)` is correct but `(R )` is incorrect
D. If `(A)` is incorrect but `(R )` is correct

Explanation

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reasoning about carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄) and its interaction with silver nitrate (AgNO₃), we will analyze both the assertion and the reasoning step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding the Assertion
The assertion states that carbon tetrachloride does not form a precipitate of AgCl when reacted with AgNO₃ solution.

**Explanation:**
- When AgNO₃ is dissolved in water, it dissociates into Ag⁺ and NO₃⁻ ions.
- For a precipitate of AgCl to form, chloride ions (Cl⁻) must be present in the solution to react with Ag⁺ ions.
- In the case of CCl₄, it is a covalent compound and does not dissociate into ions in solution.

**Conclusion:** The assertion is correct because CCl₄ does not produce Cl⁻ ions to react with Ag⁺ ions, hence no AgCl precipitate forms.

### Step 2: Understanding the Reasoning
The reasoning states that carbon tetrachloride is a liquid.

**Explanation:**
- While it is true that carbon tetrachloride is a liquid at room temperature, this fact alone does not explain why it does not form a precipitate of AgCl.
- The key reason for the lack of precipitate formation is due to the nature of the C-Cl bonds in CCl₄, which are covalent and do not ionize to produce Cl⁻ ions.

**Conclusion:** The reasoning is not a correct explanation for the assertion. Although it is a liquid, the main reason for the absence of AgCl precipitate is the lack of ionization of CCl₄.

### Final Conclusion
- The assertion is correct.
- The reasoning is correct but does not provide a valid explanation for the assertion.

### Answer:
The correct option is that both A and R are correct, but R is not the correct explanation for A.

---