Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Assertion (A): F(2) does not show dispor...

Assertion (A): `F_(2)` does not show disportion reactions.
Reason (R ): `F_(2)` is the stronger oxidising agent and is always reduced.

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we can break it down step by step: ### Step 1: Understanding Disproportionation Reactions Disproportionation reactions are a type of redox reaction where the same element is simultaneously oxidized and reduced. This means that the element must have at least two different oxidation states in the reaction. **Hint:** Recall the definition of disproportionation reactions and identify the key characteristic that distinguishes them from other types of reactions. ### Step 2: Analyzing Fluorine's Oxidation States Fluorine (F) can exhibit only two oxidation states: 0 (in elemental form) and -1 (in compounds like HF). It does not show any positive oxidation states (like +1, +2, +3, etc.) due to its high electronegativity. **Hint:** Consider the common oxidation states of fluorine and how they relate to its ability to undergo redox reactions. ### Step 3: Assessing Fluorine as an Oxidizing Agent Fluorine is known to be the strongest oxidizing agent due to its high electronegativity. This means that it readily gains electrons and is reduced, but it does not lose electrons (i.e., it does not get oxidized). **Hint:** Think about what it means for a substance to be a strong oxidizing agent and how this affects its ability to participate in oxidation reactions. ### Step 4: Conclusion on Assertion and Reason Since fluorine cannot undergo oxidation (it cannot have a positive oxidation state), it cannot participate in a disproportionation reaction. Therefore, the assertion that "F₂ does not show disproportionation reactions" is correct. The reason provided, "F₂ is the stronger oxidizing agent and is always reduced," correctly explains why the assertion is true. **Hint:** Evaluate the relationship between the assertion and the reason to determine if the reason adequately supports the assertion. ### Final Answer Both the assertion (A) and the reason (R) are correct, and the reason is a correct explanation of the assertion.
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • P-BLOCK GROUP 17 ELEMENTS - THE HALOGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY ENGLISH|Exercise Exercises (Integer)|10 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 17 ELEMENTS - THE HALOGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY ENGLISH|Exercise Exercises (Fill In The Blanks)|15 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 17 ELEMENTS - THE HALOGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY ENGLISH|Exercise Exercises (Single Correct)|69 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 16 ELEMENTS - THE OXYGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY ENGLISH|Exercise Archives Subjective|10 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 18 ELEMENTS - THE INERT GASES

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY ENGLISH|Exercise Ex 5.1 (Objective)|14 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

F_(2) is a stronger oxidising agent than Cl_(2)

Whys is F_(2) a stronger oxidising agent than Cl_(2) ?

Assertion (A): F_(2) undergoes disproportionation reaction. Reason (R ): Fluorine shows both positive and negative oxidation states.

Assertion (A): O_(2) is stronger reducing agent than F_(2) Reason (R ): F_(2) is more electronegative.

Assertion (A): PbCl_(2) is more stable than PbCl_(4) . Reason (R ): PbCl_(4) is a powerful oxidising agent.

Assertion (A) Cu^(2+) iodide is not known. Reason (R ) Cu^(2+) oxidises I^(-) to iodine.

Assertion (A): Sodium cannot be obtained by chemical reduction of its ore. Reason (R ): Sodium is one of the strongest reducing agents.

Assertion :- Mn_(2)O_(7) is acidic but MnO is basic. Reason :- Mn^(+7) is strong oxidising agent than Mn^(+2)

Give a reaction in which H_(2)O acts as an oxidising agent.

Assertion (A): HNO_(3) acts only as an oxidising agent, while HNO_(2) acts both as an oxidising agnet and a reducing agent. Reason (R ): The oxidation number of N in HNO_(3) is mximum.