A: Fig species and wasp have tight one to one relationship.
R: Angiosperms and insects are coevolved to perform a plant-pollinator interaction.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion
B. It both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion
C. If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false statements

Answer

To analyze the given statements regarding the relationship between fig species and wasps, as well as the co-evolution of angiosperms and insects, we will break down the assertions and reasons step by step.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion (A)**:
- The assertion states that "fig species and wasp have a tight one-to-one relationship."
- This means that each fig species is specifically pollinated by a particular species of wasp, and vice versa. The relationship is highly specialized and interdependent.

2. **Understanding the Reason (R)**:
- The reason states that "angiosperms and insects are co-evolved to perform a plant-pollinator interaction."
- This indicates that angiosperms (flowering plants) and insects (like wasps) have evolved together over time to facilitate pollination, which is crucial for the reproduction of many plants.

3. **Analyzing the Relationship**:
- The fig-wasp relationship is a classic example of mutualism, where both species benefit from each other. The wasp pollinates the fig, allowing it to reproduce, while the fig provides a habitat and nourishment for the wasp's larvae.
- This mutualistic relationship exemplifies the concept of co-evolution, where both species have adapted to each other's presence and needs.

4. **Evaluating the Truth of the Statements**:
- The assertion is true because the fig species and wasp indeed have a tight one-to-one relationship.
- The reason is also true because angiosperms and insects have co-evolved for effective plant-pollinator interactions.

5. **Determining the Correct Option**:
- Since both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion, the correct answer is that both the assertion and reason are true, with the reason being the correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Conclusion:
Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation for the assertion.