A : Precipitates formation takes place when
`K_(ip) gt K_(sp)` .
R : `K_(ip) = K_(sp)` for a saturated solution.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason in the corret explanation of the assertion, then mark
B. If both assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion, then mark
C. If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false then mark
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false statements , then mark

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze the assertion and the reason provided, and determine their truth values and relationships.

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
The assertion states: "Precipitates formation takes place when \( K_{ip} > K_{sp} \)."

- **Explanation**: The ionic product (\( K_{ip} \)) is the product of the concentrations of the ions in solution. The solubility product constant (\( K_{sp} \)) is a specific type of equilibrium constant that applies to the solubility of ionic compounds. When \( K_{ip} > K_{sp} \), it indicates that the solution is supersaturated, leading to the formation of precipitates as the system attempts to reach equilibrium.

- **Truth Value**: This assertion is **True**.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states: "\( K_{ip} = K_{sp} \) for a saturated solution."

- **Explanation**: When a solution is saturated, the concentrations of the ions in the solution are at equilibrium with the solid phase. At this point, the ionic product equals the solubility product constant, indicating that no further dissolution or precipitation occurs.

- **Truth Value**: This reason is also **True**.

### Step 3: Determine the Relationship
Now, we need to determine whether the reason is the correct explanation for the assertion.

- The assertion explains a condition for precipitate formation, while the reason describes the condition for a saturated solution. Although both statements are true, the reason does not explain why precipitates form when \( K_{ip} > K_{sp} \); it merely states a condition of equilibrium.

### Conclusion
Since both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason does not correctly explain the assertion, the correct option is:

**Answer: Option B** - Both assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

---