Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
A : 2 F^(-) + Cl(2) to 2 Cl^(-) + F(2) i...

A : `2 F^(-) + Cl_(2) to 2 Cl^(-) + F_(2)` is a reaction having `Delta G^0 = -ve` .
R : `Cl_(2)` is better oxidizing agent than `F_(2)` .

A

If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion , then mark (1)

B

If both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion , then mark (2)

C

If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false , then mark (3)

D

If both Assertion and Reason are false statements , then mark (4)

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion (A) and the reason (R) provided. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Assertion (A)**: The assertion states that the reaction \( 2 F^{-} + Cl_{2} \rightarrow 2 Cl^{-} + F_{2} \) has a standard Gibbs free energy change (\( \Delta G^0 \)) that is negative. A negative \( \Delta G^0 \) indicates that the reaction is spontaneous. 2. **Analyzing the Reaction**: In this reaction, \( F^{-} \) (fluoride ion) is being oxidized to \( F_{2} \) (fluorine gas), while \( Cl_{2} \) (chlorine gas) is being reduced to \( Cl^{-} \) (chloride ion). Since \( F^{-} \) is being oxidized, we need to check if this is consistent with the known properties of fluorine. 3. **Standard Reduction Potentials**: The standard reduction potential for the half-reaction \( F_{2} + 2e^{-} \rightarrow 2F^{-} \) is +2.87 V, which is the highest among all elements. This means fluorine is very strong as an oxidizing agent and typically does not get oxidized itself. 4. **Conclusion on Assertion**: Since fluorine has the highest standard reduction potential, it does not oxidize to \( F_{2} \) under normal conditions. Therefore, the assertion that \( \Delta G^0 \) is negative for this reaction is **false**. 5. **Understanding the Reason (R)**: The reason states that \( Cl_{2} \) is a better oxidizing agent than \( F_{2} \). However, since \( F_{2} \) is a stronger oxidizing agent than \( Cl_{2} \) (due to its higher standard reduction potential), this statement is also **false**. 6. **Final Evaluation**: Since both the assertion and the reason are false, the correct answer is option **D**: Both assertion and reason are false statements.
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

F_(2) is a stronger oxidising agent than Cl_(2)

Whys is F_(2) a stronger oxidising agent than Cl_(2) ?

Fluorine is a better oxidising agent than Cl_2 . It is due to

A : Cl_(2) on reaction with NaOH (cold and dilute) gives NaClO_(3) . R : Cl_(2) get oxidized only in this reaction .

Which of the following statement is // are correct regarding F^(-) and CI^(-) (i) Cl^(-) can give up an electron more easily than F^(-) (ii) Cl^(-) is smaller in size than F^(-) (iii) Cl^(-) is a better reducing agent then F^(-) (iv) F^(-) can be oxidized more readily than Cl^(-)

Assertion (A): O_(2) is stronger reducing agent than F_(2) Reason (R ): F_(2) is more electronegative.

Assertion: Cl_(2) gas belaches the articles permanently. Reason: Cl_(2) is a strong reducing agent.

Assertion (A): The electrolysis of NaCl solution gives H_(2)(g) at cathode and Cl_(2)(g) at anode. Reason (R) : Cl_(2) has higher oxidation potential than H_(2)O

Cl_(2)(g)rarr2Cl(g) , In this process value of Delta H will be -

The shape of Cl F_(2)^(-) , is