Three charges are placed as shown in fig. the magnitude of `q_(1)` is `2.00mu C`, but its sign and the value of the charge `q_(3)` is `+4.00muC`, and the net force on `q_(3)` is entirely in the negative x-direction

As per the condition given in the problem, the sign of `q_(1)` and `q_(2)` will be

The value of charge q_1 ,q_2 and q_3 as shown in the figure are

Three charges -q_1 , +q_2 and -q_3 are placed as shown in the figure. The x-component of the force on -q_1 is proportional to

A positive point charge q_(1) is placed at (a,0) and another positive point charge q_(2) is placed at (0,a) . Find the force acting on q_(1) .

Three charges -q_(1), +q_(2) and -q_(3) are placed as shown in the figure. The x -component of the force on -q_(1) is proportional to

Three charged paricles are placed on a straight line as shown in fig. q_(1) and q_(2) are fixed but q_(3) can be moved. Under the action of the forces from q_(1),q_(2) and q_(3) is in equilbrium. What is the relation between q_(1) and q_(2) .

Assertion: Two charges q_(1) and q_(2) are placed at separation r . Then magnitude of the force on each charge is F . Reason: Now a third charge q_(3) is placed near q_(1) and q_(2) . Then force on q_(1) and q_(2) remains F .

Find the force on a charge q_(1)(=20 mu C) due to the charge of q_(2)(=10 mu C) if the positions of the charges are given as P_(1)(1,-1,2) and Q(-1,1,1) . .

A charge Q located at a point vec r is in equilibrium under the combined field of three charges q_(1), q_(2) and q_(3) . If the charges q_(1) and q_(2) are located at point vec r_(1) and vec r_(2) respectively, find the direction of the force on Q due to q_(3) in terms of q_(1),(q_2), vec r_(1) vec r_(2) , and vec(r) .