Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
In a YDSE experiment, the distance betwe...

In a `YDSE` experiment, the distance between the slits `&` the screen is `100 cm`. For a certain distance between the slits, an interference pattern is observed on the screen with the fringe width `0.25 mm`. When the distance between the slits is increased by `Deltad=1.2 mm,` the fringe width decreased to `n=2//3` of the original value. In the final position, a thin glass plate of refractive index `1.5` is kept in front of one of the slits `&` the shift of central maximum is observed to be `20` fringe width. Find the thickness of the plate `&` wavelength of the incident light.

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the problem step by step, we will follow the given information and apply the relevant equations from the Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDSE). ### Step 1: Understand the given data - Distance between the slits and the screen, \( D = 100 \, \text{cm} = 1 \, \text{m} \) - Initial fringe width, \( \beta_1 = 0.25 \, \text{mm} = 0.25 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} \) - Change in distance between the slits, \( \Delta d = 1.2 \, \text{mm} = 1.2 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} \) - New fringe width, \( \beta_2 = \frac{2}{3} \beta_1 \) ### Step 2: Write the formula for fringe width The fringe width \( \beta \) in YDSE is given by: \[ \beta = \frac{\lambda D}{d} \] where \( \lambda \) is the wavelength of light, \( D \) is the distance to the screen, and \( d \) is the distance between the slits. ### Step 3: Set up the equations for the initial and new fringe widths For the initial fringe width: \[ \beta_1 = \frac{\lambda D}{d} \quad \text{(1)} \] For the new fringe width after increasing the slit distance: \[ \beta_2 = \frac{\lambda D}{d + \Delta d} \quad \text{(2)} \] Given that \( \beta_2 = \frac{2}{3} \beta_1 \), we can substitute this into equation (2): \[ \frac{2}{3} \beta_1 = \frac{\lambda D}{d + \Delta d} \] ### Step 4: Substitute \( \beta_1 \) from equation (1) into the new equation Substituting \( \beta_1 \) from equation (1) into the equation for \( \beta_2 \): \[ \frac{2}{3} \left( \frac{\lambda D}{d} \right) = \frac{\lambda D}{d + \Delta d} \] ### Step 5: Simplify the equation Cancelling \( \lambda D \) from both sides (assuming \( \lambda D \neq 0 \)): \[ \frac{2}{3d} = \frac{1}{d + \Delta d} \] Cross-multiplying gives: \[ 2(d + \Delta d) = 3d \] ### Step 6: Solve for \( d \) Expanding and rearranging: \[ 2d + 2\Delta d = 3d \implies d = 2\Delta d \] Substituting \( \Delta d = 1.2 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} \): \[ d = 2 \times 1.2 \times 10^{-3} = 2.4 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} = 2.4 \, \text{mm} \] ### Step 7: Calculate the wavelength \( \lambda \) Substituting \( d \) back into equation (1): \[ \beta_1 = \frac{\lambda D}{d} \implies \lambda = \frac{\beta_1 d}{D} \] Substituting the known values: \[ \lambda = \frac{0.25 \times 10^{-3} \times 2.4 \times 10^{-3}}{1} = 6 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{m} = 600 \, \text{nm} \] ### Step 8: Calculate the thickness of the glass plate When a glass plate of refractive index \( \mu = 1.5 \) is placed in front of one slit, the shift in the central maximum is given as \( 20 \beta_1 \). The formula for the shift \( S \) is: \[ S = ( \mu - 1 ) t \] where \( t \) is the thickness of the plate. The shift is also given by: \[ S = 20 \beta_1 = 20 \times 0.25 \times 10^{-3} = 5 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} \] Setting the two expressions for shift equal: \[ (1.5 - 1) t = 5 \times 10^{-3} \] \[ 0.5 t = 5 \times 10^{-3} \implies t = \frac{5 \times 10^{-3}}{0.5} = 10 \times 10^{-3} = 10 \, \text{mm} \] ### Final Answers - Wavelength \( \lambda = 600 \, \text{nm} \) - Thickness of the glass plate \( t = 10 \, \text{mm} \)

To solve the problem step by step, we will follow the given information and apply the relevant equations from the Young's Double Slit Experiment (YDSE). ### Step 1: Understand the given data - Distance between the slits and the screen, \( D = 100 \, \text{cm} = 1 \, \text{m} \) - Initial fringe width, \( \beta_1 = 0.25 \, \text{mm} = 0.25 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} \) - Change in distance between the slits, \( \Delta d = 1.2 \, \text{mm} = 1.2 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{m} \) - New fringe width, \( \beta_2 = \frac{2}{3} \beta_1 \) ...
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • WAVE OPTICS

    RESONANCE ENGLISH|Exercise Exercise-3 (Part-3)|22 Videos
  • WAVE ON STRING

    RESONANCE ENGLISH|Exercise Exercise- 3 PART II|7 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

In a double slit experiment, the distance between the slits is d. The screen is at a distance D from the slits. If a bright fringe is formed opposite to one of the slits, its order is

In Young's double slit experiment, the sepcaration between the slits is halved and the distance between the slits and the screen is doubled. The fringe width is

In Young's double slit experiment, the sepcaration between the slits is halved and the distance between the slits and the screen is doubled. The fringe width is

In Young's double slit experiment, the separation between the slits is halved and the distance between the slits and the screen is doubled. The fringe width is

In Young's double-slit experiment, the separation between the slits is halved and the distance between the slits and the screen in doubled. The fringe width is

In Young's double slit experiment, the distance between two slits is made three times then the fringe width will becomes

In a double slit experiment, the distance between slits in increased ten times whereas their distance from screen is halved then the fringe width is

In the Young's double slit experiment, the spacing between two slits is 0.1mm . If the screen is kept at a distance of 1.0m from the slits and the wavelength of ligth is 5000Å , then the fringe width is

In YDSE the distance between the slits is 1mm and screen is 25nm away from intensities IF the wavelength of light is 6000A the fringe width on the screen is

In a YDSE, distance between the slits and the screen is 1m, separation between the slits is 1mm and the wavelength of the light used is 5000nm . The distance of 100^(th) maxima from the central maxima is: