Statement I : Flower is aggregation of sporophylls.
Statement II : Sporophylls are modified in angiosperms .
Choose the correct answer based on the above statements.

Options

A. Both statement I and II are true and statement II is a correct explanation of statement I
B. Both statement I and II statement are true but statement II is not a correct explanation of statement I
C. Statement I is true but statement II is false
D. Both statement I and statement II are false

Answer

To solve the question, let's analyze the two statements step by step.

### Step 1: Analyze Statement I
**Statement I:** "Flower is aggregation of sporophylls."

- A flower is indeed a reproductive structure in angiosperms (flowering plants) that consists of various parts. The term "sporophylls" refers to the leaf-like structures that bear spores. In the case of flowers, these sporophylls are specialized and organized into different parts, such as petals, sepals, stamens, and carpels. Therefore, this statement is **true**.

### Step 2: Analyze Statement II
**Statement II:** "Sporophylls are modified in angiosperms."

- In angiosperms, sporophylls are modified to form the reproductive structures of the flower. For example, the microsporophylls (which develop into pollen-producing structures) are represented by stamens, and the megasporophylls (which develop into ovule-producing structures) are represented by carpels. This modification is crucial for the reproductive process in flowering plants. Therefore, this statement is also **true**.

### Step 3: Determine the Relationship Between the Statements
- Now, we need to determine if Statement II is a correct explanation of Statement I. While both statements are true, Statement II does not explain why flowers are considered aggregations of sporophylls. Instead, it describes the modification of sporophylls in angiosperms. Thus, Statement II is not a correct explanation of Statement I.

### Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Both statements are true.
- Statement II is not a correct explanation of Statement I.

The correct answer is: **Both Statement I and Statement II are true, but Statement II is not a correct explanation of Statement I.**

---