Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
How does the angular width of principal ...

How does the angular width of principal maximum in the diffraction pattern vary with the width of slit ?

A

Principal maximum increases on increasing the width of slit

B

Principal maximum decreases on decreasing the width of slit

C

Principal maximum increases on decreasing the width of slit

D

None of these

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To determine how the angular width of the principal maximum in a diffraction pattern varies with the width of the slit, we can follow these steps: ### Step 1: Understand the concept of diffraction Diffraction is the bending of waves around obstacles and the spreading of waves when they pass through small openings (slits). The diffraction pattern produced by a single slit consists of a central maximum and several minima on either side. ### Step 2: Identify the relationship between slit width and minima The position of the minima in a single-slit diffraction pattern can be described by the formula: \[ a \sin \theta = n \lambda \] where: - \( a \) = width of the slit - \( \theta \) = angle at which the minima occur - \( n \) = order of the minima (n = 1, 2, 3,...) - \( \lambda \) = wavelength of the light used ### Step 3: Approximate for small angles For small angles, we can use the approximation: \[ \sin \theta \approx \theta \] Thus, the equation becomes: \[ a \theta = n \lambda \] From this, we can express \( \theta \) as: \[ \theta = \frac{n \lambda}{a} \] ### Step 4: Determine the angular width of the principal maximum The angular width of the principal maximum is defined as the angle between the first minima on either side of the central maximum. Therefore, the angular width \( \alpha \) can be expressed as: \[ \alpha = 2 \theta \] For the first minima (n = 1): \[ \alpha = 2 \left(\frac{\lambda}{a}\right) = \frac{2\lambda}{a} \] ### Step 5: Analyze the relationship between angular width and slit width From the equation \( \alpha = \frac{2\lambda}{a} \), we can see that: - As the slit width \( a \) increases, the angular width \( \alpha \) decreases. - Conversely, as the slit width \( a \) decreases, the angular width \( \alpha \) increases. ### Conclusion Thus, the angular width of the principal maximum in the diffraction pattern varies inversely with the width of the slit. If the slit width increases, the angular width decreases, and if the slit width decreases, the angular width increases.
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

In a single slit diffraction pattern

In a diffraction pattern the width of any fringe is

Angular width of central maximum in diffraction at a single slit is……………. .

Light of wavelength 600 nm is incident normally on a slit of width 0.2 mm. The angular width of central maxima in the diffraction pattern is

The angular width of the central maximum of the diffraction patternn in a single slit (of width a) experiment, with lamda as the wavelenth of light, is

In the above the angular width of the central maximum is

Find the half angular width of the central bright maximum in the fraunhofer diffraction pattern of a slit of width 12xx10^(-5)cm when the slit is illuminated by monochromatic light of wavelength 6000 Å.

A screen is placed 50 cm from a single slit, which is illuminated with 6000 Å light. If the distance between the first and third minima in the diffraction pattern is 3.00 mm , what is the width of the slit ?

If I_0 is the intensity of the principal maximum in the single slit diffraction pattern. Then what will be its intensity when the slit width is doubled?

Light of wavelength lamda is incident on a slit width d. The resulting diffraction pattern is observed on a screen at a distance D. The linear width of the principal maximum is then equal to the width of the slit if D equals