Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
In a single - slit diffraction pattern ,...

In a single - slit diffraction pattern , the position of first secondary maximum is at `30^@` , then what will be the angular position of second minima ?

A

`sin ^(-1) (2//3)`

B

`sin^(-1) (1)`

C

`sin^(-1) (1//2)`

D

None

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the problem, we need to find the angular position of the second minima in a single-slit diffraction pattern, given that the first secondary maximum occurs at an angle of \(30^\circ\). ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Position of Secondary Maxima**: The position of the secondary maxima in a single-slit diffraction pattern is given by the formula: \[ D \sin \theta = \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \lambda \] where \(D\) is the slit width, \(\theta\) is the angle, \(\lambda\) is the wavelength, and \(n\) is the order of the maximum (0, 1, 2, ...). 2. **Applying the Given Information**: For the first secondary maximum, \(n = 1\) and \(\theta_1 = 30^\circ\): \[ D \sin(30^\circ) = \left(1 + \frac{1}{2}\right) \lambda \] Since \(\sin(30^\circ) = \frac{1}{2}\), we can substitute this into the equation: \[ D \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{2} \lambda \] 3. **Rearranging to Find \(\frac{\lambda}{D}\)**: Rearranging the equation gives: \[ \frac{\lambda}{D} = \frac{1}{3} \] 4. **Finding the Angular Position of the Second Minima**: The position of the minima is given by: \[ D \sin \theta = n \lambda \] For the second minima, \(n = 2\): \[ D \sin \theta_2 = 2 \lambda \] 5. **Substituting \(\frac{\lambda}{D}\)**: We can substitute \(\frac{\lambda}{D} = \frac{1}{3}\) into the equation: \[ D \sin \theta_2 = 2 \left(\frac{1}{3} D\right) \] Simplifying gives: \[ \sin \theta_2 = \frac{2}{3} \] 6. **Calculating \(\theta_2\)**: Finally, we find the angle \(\theta_2\): \[ \theta_2 = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) \] ### Final Answer: The angular position of the second minima is: \[ \theta_2 = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{2}{3}\right) \]
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Central fringe obtained in diffraction pattern due to a single slit-

In a single slit differaction pattern a monochromatic light of wavelength 500nm is used if angular position of the point where waves interfere from slit is 10^(-3) radians from line of central maxima. If width of the slit is 500 mum , then order of minima obtained on screen will be

In a single slit diffraction patternm, the distance between the first minimum on the left and the first minimum on the right is 5 mm. The screen on which the diffraction pattern is displayed is at a distance of 80 cm friom the silt. The wavelength is 6000 Å. The slit width ( in mm) is about .

In a single slit diffraction pattern, how is the angular width of central bright maximum changed when (i) the slit width is decreased. (ii) the distance between the slit and screen is increased. (iii) Light of smaller wavelength is used. Justify your answer.

In a single slit diffraction pattern, if the light source is used of less wave length then previous one. Then width of the central fringe will be-

Consider Fraunhoffer diffraction pattern obtained with a single slit illuminated at normal incidence. AT the angular position of the first diffraction minimum the phase difference (in radian) between the wavelengths from the opposite edges of the slit is

Consider Fraunhoffer diffraction pattern obtained with a single slit illuminated at normal incidence. At the angular position of the first diffraction minimum the phase difference (in radians) between the wavelets from the opposite edges of the slit is

The condition for obtaining secondary maxima in the diffraction pattern due to single slit is

In an experiment of single slit diffraction pattern first minimum for red light coincides with first maximum of some other wavelength. If wavelength of red light is 6600 A^(0) , then wavelength of first maximum will be :

Visible light of wavelength 6000 xx 10 ^( - 8 ) cm falls normally on a single slit and produces a diffraction pattern. It is found that the second diffraction minimum is at 60 ^(@) from the central maximum. If the first minimum is produced at theta _ 1 , then theta _ 1 is close to :