Assertion (A): UV radiation causes photodissociation of ozone into `O_(2)` and O, thus causing damage to the stratospheric change.
Reason (R): Ozone hole is resulting in global warming and climate change.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
B. It both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
C. If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false.
D. It both Assertion and Reason are false statements.

Explanation

To analyze the given assertion and reason, we can break down the information step by step.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion (A)**:
- The assertion states that UV radiation causes the photodissociation of ozone (O₃) into molecular oxygen (O₂) and atomic oxygen (O).
- This process indeed occurs when UV radiation interacts with ozone in the stratosphere, leading to the breakdown of ozone molecules.

2. **Understanding the Reason (R)**:
- The reason states that the ozone hole is resulting in global warming and climate change.
- While the depletion of the ozone layer (the "ozone hole") allows more UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface, it is not a direct cause of global warming. Global warming is primarily driven by greenhouse gases such as CO₂, methane, and others.

3. **Linking Assertion and Reason**:
- The assertion is true because UV radiation does cause the breakdown of ozone.
- The reason is misleading because, although the ozone layer is important for protecting against UV radiation, the ozone hole itself is not a direct cause of global warming. Instead, global warming is primarily attributed to the accumulation of greenhouse gases.

4. **Conclusion**:
- The assertion is true, but the reason is false. Therefore, the correct relationship is that the assertion is true, and the reason is false.

### Final Answer:
The correct option is that the assertion is true, but the reason is false.

---