Assertion : Secondary succession takes place in recently denuded area.
Reason : It is caused due to baring of an area.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion
C. If assertion is true but reason is false
D. If both assertion and reason are false.

Explanation

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion
The assertion states that "Secondary succession takes place in recently denuded area."
- Secondary succession refers to the ecological process that occurs in an area where a disturbance has destroyed an existing community but left the soil intact. This typically happens in areas that have been disturbed by events like fires, floods, or human activities such as deforestation.

### Step 2: Understand the Reason
The reason states that "It is caused due to baring of an area."
- The term "baring" refers to the removal of vegetation and the exposure of the soil. This can happen due to various disturbances, including natural events (like fires) or human activities (like land clearing). The reason explains that secondary succession occurs because the area has been disturbed and is now bare.

### Step 3: Analyze the Relationship
Now we need to determine if the reason correctly explains the assertion.
- Since secondary succession indeed occurs in areas that have been disturbed (or denuded) and this disturbance is caused by the baring of the area, we can conclude that the reason supports the assertion.

### Conclusion
Both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion. Therefore, the correct answer is:

**Option 1: Both assertion and reason are true, and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.**

---