Assertion : Transition metals are poor reducing agents.
Reasons : Transition metals form numerous alloys with other metals.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion
C. If assertion is true but reason is false
D. If both assertion and reason are false.

Explanation

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**:
- The assertion states that "Transition metals are poor reducing agents."
- Transition metals generally have a high ionization energy and a relatively stable oxidation state, which makes them less likely to donate electrons compared to alkali and alkaline earth metals. This characteristic contributes to their role as poor reducing agents.

2. **Understanding the Reason**:
- The reason states that "Transition metals form numerous alloys with other metals."
- It is true that transition metals can form various alloys with other metals, such as brass (which is an alloy of copper and zinc). However, the formation of alloys does not inherently explain why transition metals are poor reducing agents.

3. **Evaluating the Relationship**:
- Both the assertion and the reason are correct statements. However, the reason does not provide a valid explanation for the assertion. The ability to form alloys does not influence the reducing ability of transition metals.

4. **Conclusion**:
- Since both the assertion and the reason are true, but the reason does not explain the assertion, we conclude that the correct answer is that both statements are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Answer:
The correct option is: "Both assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation of the assertion."