Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
Explain why N(2) has a greater bond diss...

Explain why `N_(2)` has a greater bond dissociation energy than `N_(2)^(+)` while `O_(2)` has lesser bond dissociation energy than `O_(2)^(+).`

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To explain why \( N_2 \) has a greater bond dissociation energy than \( N_2^+ \), while \( O_2 \) has a lesser bond dissociation energy than \( O_2^+ \), we will analyze the bond order of each molecule and its correlation with bond dissociation energy. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding Bond Dissociation Energy**: - Bond dissociation energy is the energy required to break a bond in a molecule. It is directly related to the bond order of the molecule. 2. **Calculate Bond Order for \( N_2 \)**: - The molecular orbital configuration for \( N_2 \) is \( \sigma_{1s}^2 \sigma_{1s}^*^2 \sigma_{2s}^2 \sigma_{2s}^*^2 \sigma_{2p_z}^2 \pi_{2p_x}^2 \pi_{2p_y}^2 \). - The bond order can be calculated using the formula: \[ \text{Bond Order} = \frac{(\text{Number of bonding electrons} - \text{Number of antibonding electrons})}{2} \] - For \( N_2 \): \[ \text{Bond Order} = \frac{10 - 2}{2} = 3 \] 3. **Calculate Bond Order for \( N_2^+ \)**: - For \( N_2^+ \), one electron is removed from the molecular orbital configuration, typically from the highest energy level, which is \( \pi_{2p_x} \) or \( \pi_{2p_y} \). - The new configuration for \( N_2^+ \) becomes: \[ \sigma_{1s}^2 \sigma_{1s}^*^2 \sigma_{2s}^2 \sigma_{2s}^*^2 \sigma_{2p_z}^2 \pi_{2p_x}^2 \pi_{2p_y}^1 \] - Therefore, the bond order for \( N_2^+ \) is: \[ \text{Bond Order} = \frac{9 - 2}{2} = 2.5 \] 4. **Comparison of Bond Dissociation Energies**: - Since \( N_2 \) has a bond order of 3 and \( N_2^+ \) has a bond order of 2.5, \( N_2 \) has a greater bond dissociation energy than \( N_2^+ \) because higher bond order correlates with higher bond dissociation energy. 5. **Calculate Bond Order for \( O_2 \)**: - The molecular orbital configuration for \( O_2 \) is: \[ \sigma_{1s}^2 \sigma_{1s}^*^2 \sigma_{2s}^2 \sigma_{2s}^*^2 \sigma_{2p_z}^2 \pi_{2p_x}^2 \pi_{2p_y}^1 \] - The bond order for \( O_2 \) is: \[ \text{Bond Order} = \frac{10 - 6}{2} = 2 \] 6. **Calculate Bond Order for \( O_2^+ \)**: - For \( O_2^+ \), one electron is removed from the \( \pi_{2p_y} \) orbital: \[ \sigma_{1s}^2 \sigma_{1s}^*^2 \sigma_{2s}^2 \sigma_{2s}^*^2 \sigma_{2p_z}^2 \pi_{2p_x}^2 \pi_{2p_y}^0 \] - The bond order for \( O_2^+ \) is: \[ \text{Bond Order} = \frac{9 - 6}{2} = 1.5 \] 7. **Comparison of Bond Dissociation Energies for \( O_2 \) and \( O_2^+ \)**: - Since \( O_2 \) has a bond order of 2 and \( O_2^+ \) has a bond order of 2.5, \( O_2 \) has a lesser bond dissociation energy than \( O_2^+ \) because lower bond order correlates with lower bond dissociation energy. ### Conclusion: - \( N_2 \) has a greater bond dissociation energy than \( N_2^+ \) due to its higher bond order (3 vs. 2.5). - \( O_2 \) has a lesser bond dissociation energy than \( O_2^+ \) because of its lower bond order (2 vs. 2.5).
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Define bond dissociation energy.

(a) H_(2)^(+)and H_(2)^(-) ions have same bond order but H_(2)^(-) ion is more stable. Explain. (b) N_(2) has a greater bond dissociation enthalpy than N_(2)^(+) ion hals more bond dissociation enthalpy than O_(2). Why ? (c ) Can we have ahomonuclear diatomic molecule with all its ground state molecular orbitals full of electrons ? (d) When a magnet is dipped in a jar of liquid oxygen, some oxygen clings to it. Assign reason :

N_2 has greater bond energy than N_(2)^(+) but O_2 has lower bond dissociation energy than O_(2)^(+) . Explain.

Correct order of bond dissociation energy

Correct order of dissociation energy of N_(2) and N_(2)^(+) is:

The X - X bond dissociation energy is minimum in:

Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) is less that of Cl_(2) give reason.

Arrange the halongens in order of bond dissociation energies.

Which of the halogens has highest value of bond dissociation energy?

The bond dissociation energy of N_(2)^(+) is less than that of N_(2) . Show why this is the case.