Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
Assertion: ionisation energy of sulphur ...

Assertion: ionisation energy of sulphur is less than that of phosphorus.
Reason: Half filled p-orbitals have extra stability.

A

Both A and B true and R is the correct explanation A

B

Both A and R are true but R is not a correct explanation of A

C

A is true but R is false

D

A is false but R is true

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the question, we need to analyze the assertion and the reason provided. ### Step 1: Understand the Assertion The assertion states that the ionization energy of sulfur is less than that of phosphorus. - **Ionization Energy**: This is the energy required to remove an electron from an atom in its gaseous state. Generally, ionization energy increases across a period and decreases down a group in the periodic table. ### Step 2: Compare the Electron Configurations - **Phosphorus (P)** has the electron configuration: \(1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^3\) - **Sulfur (S)** has the electron configuration: \(1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^4\) ### Step 3: Analyze the Stability of Electron Configurations - Phosphorus has three electrons in the 3p sublevel, which means it has a half-filled p subshell (3p^3). - Sulfur has four electrons in the 3p sublevel (3p^4), which means it has one more electron than phosphorus. ### Step 4: Stability of Half-Filled Orbitals - Half-filled orbitals (like in phosphorus) are known to be more stable due to symmetry and exchange energy. This extra stability means that it is harder to remove an electron from phosphorus compared to sulfur. ### Step 5: Conclusion on Ionization Energies Since phosphorus has a half-filled p subshell, it is more stable and requires more energy to remove an electron compared to sulfur, which has a less stable configuration. Therefore, the assertion that the ionization energy of sulfur is less than that of phosphorus is **true**. ### Step 6: Evaluate the Reason The reason states that half-filled p-orbitals have extra stability. This is also **true** as explained in the previous steps. ### Final Conclusion Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion. ### Summary - **Assertion**: True (Ionization energy of sulfur is less than that of phosphorus) - **Reason**: True (Half-filled p-orbitals have extra stability)
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

The ionisation energy of potassium is lower than that of sodium. Give reason.

Assertion: The first ionisation energy of Be is greater than that of B . Reason: 2p-orbital is lower in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion: The first ionisation energy of Be is greater than that of B . Reason: 2p-orbital is lower in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion: The first ionization energy of Be is greater than that of B. Reason: 2p-orbital is lower in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion: The first ionization energy of Be is greater than that of B. Reason: 2p-orbital is lowerr in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion-The free gaseous Cr atom has six unpaired electrons. Reason-Half-filled s-orbital has greater stability.

Ionisation energy of sodium is ____________ than that of potassium. (more/less)

Assertion: The first ionisation energy of aluminium is lower than that of magnesium. Reason: The ionic radius of aluminium is smaller than that of magnesium.

Assertion (A) : The ionisation energy of N is more than that of O Reason (R ) : Electronic configuration of N is more stable due to half - fillied 2p orbitals

Assertion: Red phophorus is less volatile then white phosphorus. Reason: Red phosphorus has a discrete tetrahedral structure.