Assertion : Forests are renewable resource.
Reason : Conservation of forests has multifold benefits.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.
C. If assertion is true but reason is false.
D. If both assertion and reason are false.

Explanation

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**:
- The assertion states that "Forests are renewable resources." This means that forests can regenerate and be replenished naturally over time, unlike non-renewable resources which are finite.

2. **Understanding the Reason**:
- The reason provided is that "Conservation of forests has multifold benefits." This implies that protecting and managing forests leads to various advantages, such as preventing soil erosion, maintaining the water cycle, and providing resources.

3. **Evaluating the Assertion**:
- Forests are indeed renewable resources because they can grow back after being cut down or damaged, provided they are managed sustainably. This characteristic aligns with the definition of renewable resources.

4. **Evaluating the Reason**:
- The benefits of conserving forests include preventing soil erosion, maintaining biodiversity, regulating the climate, and providing materials like timber and medicinal plants. Therefore, the reason is valid and highlights the importance of forest conservation.

5. **Analyzing the Relationship**:
- While both the assertion and the reason are correct, the reason does not directly explain why forests are classified as renewable resources. The assertion focuses on the nature of forests, while the reason discusses the benefits of conservation.

6. **Conclusion**:
- Since both the assertion and the reason are correct but the reason does not justify the assertion, the correct option is that both are correct but the reason is not the correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Answer:
Both the assertion and reason are correct, but the reason does not justify the assertion.