Assertion : Wildlife is a renewable resource.
Reason : Human activities do not effect wild life.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.
C. If assertion is true but reason is false.
D. If both assertion and reason are false.

Explanation

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**: The assertion states that "Wildlife is a renewable resource."
- Renewable resources are those that can be replenished naturally over time. Examples include forests, water, and certain wildlife populations under sustainable management.

2. **Evaluating the Assertion**: While wildlife can be considered renewable in theory, it is contingent on sustainable practices. If wildlife populations are overexploited or their habitats are destroyed, they cannot renew themselves.
- Many species of wildlife have become extinct due to human activities, indicating that wildlife is not always renewable.

3. **Understanding the Reason**: The reason states that "Human activities do not affect wildlife."
- This statement is incorrect as human activities, such as deforestation, hunting, and habitat destruction, significantly impact wildlife populations and their ecosystems.

4. **Evaluating the Reason**: Human activities have led to the extinction of numerous species and have disrupted many ecosystems. Therefore, the assertion that human activities do not affect wildlife is false.

5. **Conclusion**: Both the assertion and the reason are incorrect. Wildlife is not a renewable resource in the context of current human impacts, and human activities do significantly affect wildlife.

### Final Answer:
Both the assertion and the reason are false.

---