Assertion (A): Plastic substances and mineral wastes are non-bio-degradable.
Reasoning (R): As these substances cannot be broken down by biological or microbial action, they are called non-biodegradable. Choose the correct option

Options

A. A is correct and R is the correct explanation of A.
B. A is correct and R is not the correct explanation of A.
C. A is correct and R is wrong.
D. A is wrong and R is correct.

Answer

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reasoning about plastic substances and mineral wastes, we can break it down into the following steps:

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understand the Assertion (A)**:
- The assertion states that "Plastic substances and mineral wastes are non-biodegradable."
- This means that these materials do not decompose or break down naturally in the environment.

2. **Evaluate the Reasoning (R)**:
- The reasoning states that "As these substances cannot be broken down by biological or microbial action, they are called non-biodegradable."
- This reasoning explains why the assertion is true, as it provides the rationale for classifying these substances as non-biodegradable.

3. **Check the Truthfulness of Both Statements**:
- Both the assertion and the reasoning are true. Plastic substances and mineral wastes indeed cannot be broken down by biological or microbial action, which is why they are classified as non-biodegradable.

4. **Determine the Relationship Between Assertion and Reasoning**:
- The reasoning correctly explains the assertion. Since the reasoning provides a valid explanation for why the assertion is true, we conclude that both the assertion and the reasoning are correct.

5. **Choose the Correct Option**:
- Based on the evaluation, the correct option would be that both the assertion and the reasoning are true, and the reasoning is the correct explanation of the assertion.

### Final Answer:
Both Assertion (A) and Reasoning (R) are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

---