Home
Class 12
MATHS
Let p be the statement "x is an irration...

Let p be the statement "x is an irrational number", q be the statement "y is a transcendental number" and r be the statement "x is a rational number if y is a transcendental number.
Statement-1 : r is equivalent to either p or q.
Statement-2: r is equivalent to `~{p hArr ~q)`.

A

Statement-1 is true, statement-2 is true, statement-2 is correct explanation for statement-0

B

Statement-1 is true, statement-2 is true, statement-2 is not a correct explanation for statement-0

C

Statement-1 is true, statement-2 is false

D

Statement-1 is false. statement-2 is true

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the problem, we need to analyze the statements given and determine their logical equivalences. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Identify the Statements**: - Let \( p \): "x is an irrational number". - Let \( q \): "y is a transcendental number". - Let \( r \): "x is a rational number if y is a transcendental number". 2. **Expressing Statement \( r \)**: - The statement \( r \) can be expressed in logical terms as: \[ r: q \implies \neg p \] - This means if \( y \) is a transcendental number (i.e., \( q \) is true), then \( x \) must be a rational number (i.e., \( p \) is false). 3. **Understanding the Logical Equivalence**: - The statement \( r \) can also be rewritten using the contrapositive: \[ r: \neg p \implies \neg q \] - This means if \( x \) is not a rational number (i.e., \( x \) is irrational), then \( y \) is not a transcendental number. 4. **Analyzing Statement 1**: - Statement 1 claims that \( r \) is equivalent to either \( p \) or \( q \): \[ r \equiv p \lor q \] - This is incorrect because \( r \) does not imply that either \( p \) or \( q \) must be true; it states a conditional relationship. 5. **Analyzing Statement 2**: - Statement 2 claims that \( r \) is equivalent to \( \neg p \iff \neg q \): \[ r \equiv \neg p \iff \neg q \] - This is correct because it captures the logical relationship established in step 3. 6. **Conclusion**: - Therefore, Statement 1 is false, and Statement 2 is true. ### Final Answer: - Statement 1 is false, and Statement 2 is true.
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • MATHEMATICAL REASONING

    ML KHANNA|Exercise PROBLEM SET (2)|15 Videos
  • LOGARITHMS AND SURDS

    ML KHANNA|Exercise Miscellaneous exercise|3 Videos
  • MATRICES

    ML KHANNA|Exercise COMPREHENSION|3 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Let p be the statement “x is an irrational number,' q be the statement 'y is a trascendental number', and r be the statement 'x is a rational number iff y is a transcendental number '. Statement-1 r is equivalent to either q or p. Statement-2:r is equivalent to (p harr~q)

The statement p to (~q) is equivalent to

Statements -1 : ~(pharr~q) is equivalent to p harr q Statement-2: (~ p harr ~q) is a tautology.

Statement-1 : ~ (p hArr ~ q) is equivalent to p hArrq. Statement-2: ~ (p hArr q) is a tautology

The statement p to(q to p) is equivalent to

The statement (~(phArr q))^^p is equivalent to

The statement (p rarr q ) rarr p is equivalent to