Assertion: Force of friction depends on the actual area of contact.
Reason: Larger the area of actual contact, larger is oppose to motion.

Options

A. If both assertion `&` Reason are True `&` the Reason is a corrrect explanation of the Asserion.
B. If both Assertion `&` Reason are True but Reason is not correct explanation of the Assertion.
C. If Assertion is Trie but the Reason is False.
D. If both Assertion `&` Reason are false

Explanation

To analyze the given assertion and reason, we can break down the problem step by step:

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion
The assertion states that "Force of friction depends on the actual area of contact."

- **Explanation**: The force of friction is generally expressed by the equation:
\[ F = \mu \times N \]
where \( F \) is the force of friction, \( \mu \) is the coefficient of friction, and \( N \) is the normal force. This equation indicates that the frictional force is dependent on the normal force and the coefficient of friction, but not on the area of contact.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states that "Larger the area of actual contact, larger is opposed to motion."

- **Explanation**: This statement implies that if the area of contact increases, the frictional force also increases. However, as established in the analysis of the assertion, the frictional force does not depend on the area of contact. Therefore, this reasoning is also incorrect.

### Step 3: Conclusion
Since both the assertion and the reason are false, we conclude that:

- **Assertion**: False
- **Reason**: False

Thus, the correct answer is that both the assertion and the reason are incorrect.

---