Assertion: In numerical taxonomy each character is given equal importance.
Reason: It is quantitative arrangement based on computational and satisfied analyase of number and codes of the characters.

Options

A. If both assertion and Reason are true and the reason is a correct explanation of the assertion.
B. If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not a correct explanation of the Assertion.
C. If Assertion is True but the Reason is False.
D. If both Assertion and Reason are False.

Answer

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**: The assertion states that in numerical taxonomy, each character is given equal importance. This means that all traits or features of the organisms being classified are treated with the same level of significance when determining their relationships.

**Hint**: Consider what it means for characters to have equal importance in a classification system.

2. **Understanding the Reason**: The reason provided explains that numerical taxonomy is based on a quantitative arrangement that utilizes computational methods for analyzing the number and codes of characters. This suggests that numerical taxonomy relies on mathematical and statistical techniques to classify organisms.

**Hint**: Think about how computational methods can help in reducing human error in classification.

3. **Analyzing the Relationship**: Both the assertion and reason are true. The assertion is correct because numerical taxonomy indeed treats each character equally. The reason is also true as it correctly describes the methodology used in numerical taxonomy.

**Hint**: Reflect on how the methodology supports the assertion.

4. **Evaluating the Explanation**: While both the assertion and reason are true, the reason does not serve as a direct explanation for the assertion. The reason describes the methodology but does not clarify why equal importance is given to each character.

**Hint**: Consider if the reason directly explains the assertion or if it simply describes the process.

5. **Conclusion**: Therefore, the correct conclusion is that both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.

**Hint**: Summarize your findings to determine the relationship between the assertion and reason.

### Final Answer:
Both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.