Assertion : Lipids are not strictly macromolecules
Reason: Molecualr weight of lipids does not exceeds 800 Dalton

Options

A. If both assertion & Reason are ture & the Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion
B. If both Assertion & Reason ar True but Reason is not a correct explantation of the Assertion
C. If Assertion is True but the Reason is False
D. If both Assertion & Reason are false

Answer

To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, let's break down the information step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding the Assertion
The assertion states that "Lipids are not strictly macromolecules."
- Macromolecules are typically defined as large molecules with high molecular weights, generally exceeding 1000 Daltons.
- Lipids, while they can form larger structures (like membranes), are often smaller molecules and do not fit the strict definition of macromolecules.

### Step 2: Understanding the Reason
The reason states that "Molecular weight of lipids does not exceed 800 Dalton."
- This statement is generally true; many lipids have molecular weights that are less than 800 Daltons.
- This supports the assertion that lipids are not considered macromolecules since they do not meet the typical molecular weight criteria.

### Step 3: Evaluating the Relationship
Now, we need to evaluate if the reason correctly explains the assertion.
- Since the assertion is that lipids are not strictly macromolecules, and the reason provides a valid explanation (that their molecular weight does not exceed 800 Daltons), we can conclude that both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is indeed a correct explanation of the assertion.

### Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Both the assertion and the reason are true.
- The reason correctly explains why lipids are not classified as macromolecules.

### Final Answer
Both assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

---