Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
Why is a .(2)^(4)He nucleus more stable ...

Why is a `._(2)^(4)He` nucleus more stable than a `._(3)^(4)Li` nucles ?

A

The strong nuclear force is larger when the neutron to proton ratio is higher

B

The laws of nuclear physics forbid a nucleus from containing more protons than neutrons

C

Forces other than the strong nuclear force make the lithium nucleus less stable

D

None of the above

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To determine why a \(_{2}^{4}\text{He}\) nucleus is more stable than a \(_{3}^{4}\text{Li}\) nucleus, we can analyze the neutron-to-proton ratio and the forces acting within the nucleus. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Identify the Composition of the Nuclei**: - The \(_{2}^{4}\text{He}\) nucleus (Helium) has 2 protons and 2 neutrons. - The \(_{3}^{4}\text{Li}\) nucleus (Lithium) has 3 protons and 1 neutron. 2. **Calculate the Neutron-to-Proton Ratio**: - For Helium: Neutron-to-Proton Ratio = Number of Neutrons / Number of Protons = 2 / 2 = 1. - For Lithium: Neutron-to-Proton Ratio = Number of Neutrons / Number of Protons = 1 / 3 ≈ 0.33. 3. **Analyze Stability Based on Neutron-to-Proton Ratio**: - A neutron-to-proton ratio of 1 (like in Helium) is generally considered stable. - A lower ratio (like in Lithium) suggests instability, as there are not enough neutrons to effectively counterbalance the electrostatic repulsion between the protons. 4. **Consider the Strong Nuclear Force**: - The strong nuclear force binds protons and neutrons together in the nucleus. It is more effective when there are more neutrons present to help bind the protons. - In Helium, the strong nuclear force is sufficient to overcome the repulsion between the 2 protons. - In Lithium, the presence of 3 protons increases the electrostatic repulsion, which is not adequately countered by the single neutron. 5. **Electrostatic Repulsion**: - In Helium, with only 2 protons, there is less electrostatic repulsion compared to Lithium, which has 3 protons. - The increased repulsion in Lithium contributes to its instability. 6. **Conclusion**: - The \(_{2}^{4}\text{He}\) nucleus is more stable than the \(_{3}^{4}\text{Li}\) nucleus due to a favorable neutron-to-proton ratio and a lower level of electrostatic repulsion. ### Final Answer: The \(_{2}^{4}\text{He}\) nucleus is more stable than the \(_{3}^{4}\text{Li}\) nucleus because it has a neutron-to-proton ratio of 1, which is ideal for stability, while Lithium has a lower ratio of approximately 0.33, leading to greater instability due to increased electrostatic repulsion among protons.
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

The compound unstabel nucleus ._(92)^(236)U often decays in accordance with the following reaction ._(92)^(236)U rarr ._(54)^(140)Xe +._(38)^(94)Sr + other particles During the reaction, the uranium nucleus ''fissions'' (splits) into the two smaller nuceli have higher nuclear binding energy per nucleon (although the lighter nuclei have lower total nuclear binding energies, because they contain fewer nucleons). Inside a nucleus, the nucleons (protons and neutrons)attract each other with a ''strong nuclear'' force. All neutrons exert approxiamtely the same strong nuclear force on each other. This force holds the nuclear are very close together at intranuclear distances. Why is a ._2^4He nucleus more stable than a ._3^4Li nucleus?

AgI_(2)^(-) complex is more stable than AgF_(2)^(-) , why?

Which one is more stable and why?

Why K _(3)[Fe(CN)_(6)] is more stable than K_(4)[Fe(CN)_(6)]

Why is Pt(IV) more stable than Ni(IV).

Why is 1^@ carbanion more stable than a 2 carbanion ?

Why is europium (II) more stable than cerium (II) ?

Which of the following alkene is more stable than

Why H_(2) is more stable than H_(2)^(+) while He_(2)^(+) is more stable than He_(2) ?