Laws of nature are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the word ''Law'' in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities of nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law-giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature, it is not punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated.
The author is not happy with the word 'law' because

Options

A. it expresses rigidity and harshness
B. it implies an agency which has made them
C. it does not convey the sense of nature's uniformity
D. it gives rise to false beliefs

Answer

C