A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.
Statement:
Should income tax be abolished in developed countries?
Arguments:
1. Yes, it will motivate to earn more.
2. No, people must learn to share their wealth for the betterment of other people.

Options

A. Either argument 1 or 2 is strong
B. Only argument 1 is strong
C. Neither argument 1 nor 2 is strong
D. Only argument 2 is strong

Answer

To solve the problem, we need to analyze the statement and the two arguments presented.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Identify the Statement**:
The statement in question is: "Should income tax be abolished in developed countries?"

2. **Analyze Argument 1**:
The first argument states: "Yes, it will motivate to earn more."
- **Evaluation**: This argument suggests that abolishing income tax would encourage people to earn more. However, it lacks depth as it does not consider the implications of such a decision on society as a whole. It focuses solely on individual motivation without addressing the broader societal impact of income tax.

3. **Analyze Argument 2**:
The second argument states: "No, people must learn to share their wealth for the betterment of other people."
- **Evaluation**: This argument presents a strong case against abolishing income tax. It emphasizes the importance of sharing wealth for societal improvement and suggests that taxes can be used for public services and welfare. This argument considers the collective benefit of maintaining income tax, making it a stronger argument.

4. **Conclusion**:
After evaluating both arguments, we conclude that:
- Argument 1 is weak because it does not address the societal implications of abolishing income tax.
- Argument 2 is strong because it highlights the importance of wealth distribution for the betterment of society.

5. **Final Answer**:
Therefore, the correct answer is that only Argument 2 is strong.