The earlier understanding among educational psychologists regarding gifted children, that they were associated primarily with high IQ, is changing now because of
The earlier understanding among educational psychologists regarding gifted children, that they were associated primarily with high IQ, is changing now because of
A
universal criticism of Sternberg's Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
B
better understanding of Vygotsky's theory of socio-cultural development
C
general acceptability of Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences
D
None of the above
Text Solution
Verified by Experts
The correct Answer is:
C
Topper's Solved these Questions
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
As a nation, we are in a great dilemma on the financing of public higher educational institutions. Highly subsidized quality higher education, with admissions based strictly on merit, continues to be a great hope for upward socio- economic (345)[alternate]. This public demand has also ensured that there is consensus across the political spectrum on the need for setting up new IITs, IIMS, AIIMS, NITs, etc. On the other hand, as the number of such institutions increases, the (346) main] requirements for supporting them will prove to be a challenge. What are the alternatives? Globally there is a shift towards charging a higher (347) Fraction] of education costs as fees even in European countries where traditionally, higher education was completely free. For the purpose of inclusion of students from economically weaker sections, there is the provision of education loans, often at lower-than-commercial rates. This has resulted in education loan-driven higher education, which has clear_(348)[explicit] for blocking the socio-economic mobility of poor people, even in an affluent country like the United States. In a country like India, public-funded institutions where the full fee is financed through loans are undesirable for many reasons. One, it will make education inaccessible to many who cannot afford to be (349) [casted] with such large loans Second, heavy debt would result in higher education being seen more as capital investment. It would lead to the clear (350)__ Graduation objective of getting a quick return on investment. The net result would be that graduates would opt for safe career options - even more than they currently do-that provide the "highest package" and not those choices that may be low-paying but have greater social value and impact and which the graduate may (351) [needlessly] want to pursue. Medical education in India has already fallen into this trap, with high cost of education in private and foreign institutions, the increase in volume is not resulting in (352) [producing] access for a significant section of the population. Further, in the Indian socio-economic context where, even today, most students pursue academic programmes and careers that are forced on them by family and not out of their own choice, there is another great disadvantage. Just when we were seeing some change - in at least a small fraction of students the increase in fees or a greater loan burden would put the clock back The "loan model" is gaining (353) attenuations] in the public (354)_[regard] in India primarily driven by the stories of high-paying jobs for IIT graduates
ARIHANT PUBLICATION PUNJAB-IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING THE TALENTED, CREATIVE AND SPECIALLY ABLED LEARNERS-CHAPTER EXERCISE
- Which of the following learners are included in the term 'speciallyabl...
Text Solution
|
- The earlier understanding among educational psychologists regarding gi...
Text Solution
|
- Abhishek finishes all his work quicker than the others in his class. A...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following are indicators of Mathematical giftedness? A....
Text Solution
|
- Mohini, a Class IV student, is very good at dancing and has won many p...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following statements are true for gifted children? A. T...
Text Solution
|
- Which one of the following is not a characteristic of a creative child...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following statements is not true?
Text Solution
|
- Amit is in Class 5. He shows a remarkable ability in generating new id...
Text Solution
|
- In your opinion, which of the following methods should be adopted for ...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following is not helpful for development of creativity in...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following will foster creativity among learners?
Text Solution
|
- Teaching methods for gifted children should encourage
Text Solution
|
- Which of the methods can be adopted by a teacher to develop creativity...
Text Solution
|
- Which one of the following activities occupies the largest area of the...
Text Solution
|
- Teachers can change the learning environment in the classroom to addre...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following activities can be classified as a highly creati...
Text Solution
|
- Self-directed learning' for gifted students means that they .........
Text Solution
|
- The teacher can differentiate content so as to engage gifted learners ...
Text Solution
|
- Which of the following is the usual method used by good teachers to ke...
Text Solution
|