Assertion (A): Norman E. Borlaug was the father of "Green revolution".
Reason (R) : Green revolution is the period when there is significant increase in agricultural productivity of grains (specially wheat and rice).

Options

A. Both assertion (A) and reason (R ) are true and reason (R ) is the correct explanation of assertion (A ) .
B. Both assertion (A) and reason ( R) are true but reason (R ) is not the correct explaination of assertion (A ) .
C. Assertion (A) is true but reason (R ) is false .
D. Assertion (A ) is false but reason (R ) is true.

Answer

To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we can break it down into the following steps:

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion
The assertion states that "Norman E. Borlaug was the father of the Green Revolution." This means that Borlaug is credited with initiating or significantly contributing to the Green Revolution, which transformed agricultural practices.

### Step 2: Understand the Reason
The reason given is that "Green Revolution is the period when there is a significant increase in agricultural productivity of grains (especially wheat and rice)." This indicates that the Green Revolution was characterized by advancements in agricultural techniques that led to higher yields of staple crops, particularly wheat and rice.

### Step 3: Historical Context
The Green Revolution began in the 1950s and peaked in the late 1960s. It involved the development of high-yielding varieties of crops, the use of chemical fertilizers, and improved irrigation techniques. Norman E. Borlaug played a crucial role in developing high-yielding wheat varieties, which contributed significantly to increased food production during this period.

### Step 4: Evaluate the Relationship
Both the assertion and the reason are true. The assertion correctly identifies Borlaug as a key figure in the Green Revolution, while the reason accurately describes what the Green Revolution entailed—an increase in agricultural productivity, particularly of wheat and rice.

### Conclusion
Since both the assertion and reason are correct, and the reason provides a valid explanation for the assertion, we conclude that:

**Both Assertion and Reason are correct, and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion.**

---