closed packing

Three-dimensional close packing in solids is referred to as stacking the second square closed packing exactly above the first. In this tight packing, the spheres are horizontally and vertically correctly balanced. Similarly, we can obtain a simple cubic lattice by adding more layers, one above the other. This can be done in two ways. Three-dimensional close packing from two-dimensional square close-packed layers: By putting the second square closed packing exactly above the first, it is possible to form three-dimensional close packing. In this tight packing, the spheres are horizontally and vertically correctly balanced. Similarly, we can obtain a simple cubic lattice by adding more layers, one above the other.Three-dimensional close packing from two-dimensional hexagonal close-packed layers: With the assistance, of two-dimensional hexagonal packed layers, three-dimensional close packing can be obtained. The coordination number of cubic closed packing is:

Three-dimensional close packing in solids is referred to as stacking the second square closed packing exactly above the first. In this tight packing, the spheres are horizontally and vertically correctly balanced. Similarly, we can obtain a simple cubic lattice by adding more layers, one above the other. This can be done in two ways. Three-dimensional close packing from two-dimensional square close-packed layers: By putting the second square closed packing exactly above the first, it is possible to form three-dimensional close packing. In this tight packing, the spheres are horizontally and vertically correctly balanced. Similarly, we can obtain a simple cubic lattice by adding more layers, one above the other.Three-dimensional close packing from two-dimensional hexagonal close-packed layers: With the assistance, of two-dimensional hexagonal packed layers, three-dimensional close packing can be obtained. The correct statement about zns crystal is:

Assertion . Hexagonal close packing is equally closely packed than cubic close packing . Reason. Hexagonal close packing has a corrdination number of 12 whereas cubic close packing has a coordination number of 8.

The ratio of closed packed atoms to tetrahedral holes in cubic close packing is :

The ratio of close packed atoms to octahderal holes in hexagonal close packing is

Assertion: Hexagonal close packing in more light than cubic close packing. Reason: Hexagonal close packing has C.N of 12 whereas cubic close packing has C.N. of 8.

Identical spheres are undergoing two-dimensinal packing in squre close packing and hexagonal close packing. Which is correct regarding the spheres?