Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorganic solids using X-ray diffraction because some of the mathematical tools for analyzing the data had not yet been developed. Once a trial structure was proposed, it was relatively easy to calculate the diffraction pattern, but it was difficult to go the other way (from the diffraction pattern to the structure) if nothing was known a priori about the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell. It was important to develop some guidelines for guessing the coordination numbers and bonding geometries of atoms in crystals. The first such rules were proposed by Linus Pauling, who considered how one might pack together oppositely charged spheres of different radii.
Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation.
If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller catin fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry.
`{:("Coordiantion number","Geometry",rho =(r_("cation"))/(r_("amion"))),(2,"linear",0-0.155),(3,"triangular",0.155 - 0.225),(4,"tetrahedral",0.225 - 0.414),(4,"square planar",0.414 - 0.732),(6,"octahedral",0.414 - 0.732),(8,"cubic",0.732 - 1.0),(12,"cuboctahedral",1.0):}`
(Source : Ionic Radii and Radius Ratios. (2021, June 8). Retrieved June 29, 2021, from https://chem.ibretexts.org/@go/page/183346)
A solid AB has square planar structure. If the radius of cation `A^(+)` is 120 pm, calculate the maximum possible value of anion `B^(-)`.
Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorganic solids using X-ray diffraction because some of the mathematical tools for analyzing the data had not yet been developed. Once a trial structure was proposed, it was relatively easy to calculate the diffraction pattern, but it was difficult to go the other way (from the diffraction pattern to the structure) if nothing was known a priori about the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell. It was important to develop some guidelines for guessing the coordination numbers and bonding geometries of atoms in crystals. The first such rules were proposed by Linus Pauling, who considered how one might pack together oppositely charged spheres of different radii.
Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation.
If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller catin fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry.
`{:("Coordiantion number","Geometry",rho =(r_("cation"))/(r_("amion"))),(2,"linear",0-0.155),(3,"triangular",0.155 - 0.225),(4,"tetrahedral",0.225 - 0.414),(4,"square planar",0.414 - 0.732),(6,"octahedral",0.414 - 0.732),(8,"cubic",0.732 - 1.0),(12,"cuboctahedral",1.0):}`
(Source : Ionic Radii and Radius Ratios. (2021, June 8). Retrieved June 29, 2021, from https://chem.ibretexts.org/@go/page/183346)
A solid AB has square planar structure. If the radius of cation `A^(+)` is 120 pm, calculate the maximum possible value of anion `B^(-)`.
Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation.
If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller catin fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry.
`{:("Coordiantion number","Geometry",rho =(r_("cation"))/(r_("amion"))),(2,"linear",0-0.155),(3,"triangular",0.155 - 0.225),(4,"tetrahedral",0.225 - 0.414),(4,"square planar",0.414 - 0.732),(6,"octahedral",0.414 - 0.732),(8,"cubic",0.732 - 1.0),(12,"cuboctahedral",1.0):}`
(Source : Ionic Radii and Radius Ratios. (2021, June 8). Retrieved June 29, 2021, from https://chem.ibretexts.org/@go/page/183346)
A solid AB has square planar structure. If the radius of cation `A^(+)` is 120 pm, calculate the maximum possible value of anion `B^(-)`.
A
240 pm
B
270 pm
C
280 pm
D
290 pm
Text Solution
AI Generated Solution
The correct Answer is:
To solve the problem, we need to determine the maximum possible value of the anion radius \( B^- \) for a solid \( AB \) that has a square planar structure. The radius of the cation \( A^+ \) is given as 120 pm.
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. **Identify the Coordination Geometry and Radius Ratio:**
- The problem states that the solid \( AB \) has a square planar structure. According to the provided table, the radius ratio \( \rho \) for square planar coordination is between 0.414 and 0.732.
2. **Set Up the Equations:**
- Let the radius of the anion \( B^- \) be \( x \).
- The radius ratio \( \rho \) is defined as:
\[
\rho = \frac{r_{\text{cation}}}{r_{\text{anion}}} = \frac{120 \, \text{pm}}{x}
\]
3. **Calculate the Maximum Anion Radius Using the Lower Limit:**
- Using the lower limit of the radius ratio (0.414):
\[
0.414 = \frac{120 \, \text{pm}}{x}
\]
- Rearranging gives:
\[
x = \frac{120 \, \text{pm}}{0.414} \approx 289.8 \, \text{pm}
\]
4. **Calculate the Minimum Anion Radius Using the Upper Limit:**
- Using the upper limit of the radius ratio (0.732):
\[
0.732 = \frac{120 \, \text{pm}}{x}
\]
- Rearranging gives:
\[
x = \frac{120 \, \text{pm}}{0.732} \approx 164.0 \, \text{pm}
\]
5. **Determine the Maximum Possible Value of the Anion Radius:**
- The maximum possible value of the anion radius \( B^- \) corresponds to the lower limit of the radius ratio, which we calculated as approximately 289.8 pm.
6. **Final Answer:**
- The maximum possible value of the anion \( B^- \) is approximately **290 pm**.
To solve the problem, we need to determine the maximum possible value of the anion radius \( B^- \) for a solid \( AB \) that has a square planar structure. The radius of the cation \( A^+ \) is given as 120 pm.
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. **Identify the Coordination Geometry and Radius Ratio:**
- The problem states that the solid \( AB \) has a square planar structure. According to the provided table, the radius ratio \( \rho \) for square planar coordination is between 0.414 and 0.732.
2. **Set Up the Equations:**
...
Topper's Solved these Questions
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems
Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorganic solids using X-ray diffraction because some of the mathematical tools for analyzing the data had not yet been developed. Once a trial structure was proposed, it was relatively easy to calculate the diffraction pattern, but it was difficult to go the other way (from the diffraction pattern to the structure) if nothing was known a priori about the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell. It was important to develop some guidelines for guessing the coordination numbers and bonding geometries of atoms in crystals. The first such rules were proposed by Linus Pauling, who considered how one might pack together oppositely charged spheres of different radii. Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation. If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller cation fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry. A "good fit" is considered to be one where the cation can touch:
Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorganic solids using X-ray diffraction because some of the mathematical tools for analyzing the data had not yet been developed. Once a trial structure was proposed, it was relatively easy to calculate the diffraction pattern, but it was difficult to go the other way (from the diffraction pattern to the structure) if nothing was known a priori about the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell. It was important to develop some guidelines for guessing the coordination numbers and bonding geometries of atoms in crystals. The first such rules were proposed by Linus Pauling, who considered how one might pack together oppositely charged spheres of different radii. Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation. If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller catin fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry. {:("Coordiantion number","Geometry",rho =(r_("cation"))/(r_("amion"))),(2,"linear",0-0.155),(3,"triangular",0.155 - 0.225),(4,"tetrahedral",0.225 - 0.414),(4,"square planar",0.414 - 0.732),(6,"octahedral",0.414 - 0.732),(8,"cubic",0.732 - 1.0),(12,"cuboctahedral",1.0):} (Source : Ionic Radii and Radius Ratios. (2021, June 8). Retrieved June 29, 2021, from https://chem.ibretexts.org/@go/page/183346) The radius of Ag^(+) ion is 126 pm and of I^(-) ion is 216 pm. The coordination number of Ag^(+) ion is :
Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorganic solids using X-ray diffraction because some of the mathematical tools for analyzing the data had not yet been developed. Once a trial structure was proposed, it was relatively easy to calculate the diffraction pattern, but it was difficult to go the other way (from the diffraction pattern to the structure) if nothing was known a priori about the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell. It was important to develop some guidelines for guessing the coordination numbers and bonding geometries of atoms in crystals. The first such rules were proposed by Linus Pauling, who considered how one might pack together oppositely charged spheres of different radii. Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation. If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller cation fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry. The radius of Ag^+ ion is 126pm and of I^- ion is 216pm. The coordination number of Ag^+ ion is:
Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorganic solids using X-ray diffraction because some of the mathematical tools for analyzing the data had not yet been developed. Once a trial structure was proposed, it was relatively easy to calculate the diffraction pattern, but it was difficult to go the other way (from the diffraction pattern to the structure) if nothing was known a priori about the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell. It was important to develop some guidelines for guessing the coordination numbers and bonding geometries of atoms in crystals. The first such rules were proposed by Linus Pauling, who considered how one might pack together oppositely charged spheres of different radii. Pauling proposed from geometric considerations that the quality of the "fit" depended on the radius ratio of the anion and the cation. If the anion is considered as the packing atom in the crystal, then the smaller cation fills interstitial sites ("holes"). Cations will find arrangements in which they can contact the largest number of anions. If the cation can touch all of its nearest neighbour anions then the fit is good. If the cation is too small for a given site, that coordination number will be unstable and it will prefer a lower coordination structure. The table below gives the ranges of cation/anion radius ratios that give the best fit for a given coordination geometry. A solid AB has square planar structure. If the radius of cation A^+ is 120pm,Calculate the maximum possible value of anion B^-
Neutron diffraction pattern is used to determine
In a diffraction pattern the width of any fringe is
The given structure was proposed with the help of X-ray diffraction data produced by:
The centre of the diffraction pattern in Fraunhofer diffraction is always
EDUCART PUBLICATION-SAMPLE PAPER 01-SECTION-C
- Which of the following analogies is correct:
Text Solution
|
- Complete the following analogy: Same molecular formula but different...
Text Solution
|
- Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorgani...
Text Solution
|
- Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorgani...
Text Solution
|
- Early crystallographers had trouble solving the structures of inorgani...
Text Solution
|