Assertion (A): Kirchhoff's junction law follows conservation of charge.
Reason (R): Kirchhoff's loop law follows conservation of energy.

Options

A. Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
B. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
C. (A) is true but (R) is false.
D. (A) is false and (R) is also false.

Explanation

To analyze the given assertion and reason, we will break down the concepts involved in Kirchhoff's laws and their implications.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding Kirchhoff's Junction Law**:
- Kirchhoff's Junction Law states that the total current entering a junction must equal the total current leaving the junction. This is based on the principle of conservation of charge, which states that charge cannot be created or destroyed.

2. **Understanding Kirchhoff's Loop Law**:
- Kirchhoff's Loop Law states that the sum of the potential differences (voltages) around any closed loop in a circuit must equal zero. This is derived from the principle of conservation of energy, which indicates that energy supplied in a circuit must equal energy used.

3. **Evaluating the Assertion (A)**:
- The assertion states that "Kirchhoff's junction law follows conservation of charge." This is true because the law directly reflects the conservation of charge principle.

4. **Evaluating the Reason (R)**:
- The reason states that "Kirchhoff's loop law follows conservation of energy." This is also true, as the loop law is based on the idea that energy supplied must equal energy consumed in a closed circuit.

5. **Determining the Relationship Between A and R**:
- While both statements (A and R) are correct, the reason (R) does not explain the assertion (A). The assertion is about charge conservation, while the reason is about energy conservation, which are two different principles.

6. **Conclusion**:
- Both the assertion and the reason are correct, but the reason is not the correct explanation for the assertion. Therefore, the answer to the question is that both statements are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.

### Final Answer:
- Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A.