Statement: An official of the sports committee has been accused of corruption and favouritism.
Courses of action: I. The committee should sack the official imediately.
II. The committee should dismiss the allegation as mischievous talk.
III. The committee should suspend the official for the time being.

Options

A. None follows
B. Only III follows
C. Either I or III follows
D. Either II or III follows

Answer

A

Explanation

None of the actions is rational enough. I advocates sacking the official on mere accusation and without enquiry. II suggests ignoring the accusation without enquiry. III has the same flow as I has. None of the three actions are recommendable without at least a prima facie evidence.