The candidate must not be above 30 years of age as on 1st August, 1995.
II. The candidate must be an M.Sc. with at least 65 % marks.
III. The candidate must have submitted at least one paper on science during his academic career.
IV. The candidate's application must be accompanied by the recommes. dation of a prodessor of his institute.
V. The candidate should have obtained at least 60% marks in the interview that carries full marks of 150.
If a candidate fulfils all these criteria, he or she would be appolated as a Science Officer in the organisation. However, if a candidate fulffer all other criteria except
a) I above, his or her case may be referred to the M.D., Personnel.
b) II above, but has submitted more than two papers, he or she may be aappointed as Assistant Science Officer.
c) III above, but has 75% or more marks in M.Sc., he or she may be appointed as Science Officer.
Now read the information presented about each of the candidates below, and decide what course of action would be taken in his or her case. Markanswer.
Ranjan Manudhanaiah is 29 years old. He is an M.Sc. with 71% makrs He has obtained the required recommendation. He has submitted two papers during his career. The marks obtained by him in the li more than that obtained by him in the interview are more than that obtained by Sarita Kid Lakshmi.

Options

A. if the candidate should be appointed as Science Officer.
B. if the candidate should be appointed as Assistant Science Officer.
C. if the case needs to be referred to the M.D., Personnel.
D. if the data are indaequate, i.e., if it is not possible to decide, on the basis of the given data, the exact course of action that would be taken.

Answer

D

Explanation

Minimum marks required in the interview is: 60% of 150=90. Sarita has 89. He has more than Sarita. But it means he may have 89.5 or 91 as well. Hence, data are inadequate.