The candidate must not be above 30 years of age as on 1st August, 1995.
II. The candidate must be an M.Sc. with at least 65 % marks.
III. The candidate must have submitted at least one paper on science during his academic career.
IV. The candidate's application must be accompanied by the recommes. dation of a prodessor of his institute.
V. The candidate should have obtained at least 60% marks in the interview that carries full marks of 150.
If a candidate fulfils all these criteria, he or she would be appolated as a Science Officer in the organisation. However, if a candidate fulffer all other criteria except
a) I above, his or her case may be referred to the M.D., Personnel.
b) II above, but has submitted more than two papers, he or she may be aappointed as Assistant Science Officer.
c) III above, but has 75% or more marks in M.Sc., he or she may be appointed as Science Officer.
Now read the information presented about each of the candidates below, and decide what course of action would be taken in his or her case. Markanswer.
Arvind Mishra is an M.Sc with 79% marks but has not submited any paper. He has obtined the recommendation of his Professor. He has 98 in the interview. He was born earlier than Ms. Sapurn.

Options

A. if the candidate should be appointed as Science Officer.
B. if the candidate should be appointed as Assistant Science Officer.
C. if the case needs to be referred to the M.D., Personnel.
D. if the candidate is not to be selected.

Explanation

More than one basic condition violated.