Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
(A) : The electronic configuration of Cr...

(A) : The electronic configuration of Cr is `[Ar]3d^(5)4s^(1)` but not `[Ar]3d^(4)4s^(2)`
(R) : Lowering energy with configuration `[Ar]3d^(5) 4s^(1)` is more than that with configuration `[Ar]3d^(4)4s^(2)`

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the question regarding the electronic configuration of chromium (Cr), we need to analyze both the assertion (A) and the reason (R) provided. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding Electronic Configuration**: - The electronic configuration of an element describes the distribution of electrons in its atomic orbitals. For chromium (Cr), the expected configuration based on the Aufbau principle would be `[Ar] 3d^4 4s^2`. 2. **Actual Electronic Configuration of Chromium**: - However, the actual electronic configuration of chromium is `[Ar] 3d^5 4s^1`. This is an exception to the expected configuration. 3. **Reason for the Exception**: - The reason for this exception lies in the stability associated with half-filled and fully filled d orbitals. A half-filled d subshell (with 5 electrons) provides extra stability due to: - **Electron Exchange Energy**: Half-filled and fully filled orbitals allow for greater electron exchange interactions, which lowers the energy of the atom. - **Symmetry**: A half-filled d subshell has a symmetrical distribution of electrons, which also contributes to stability. 4. **Comparing Energies**: - The configuration `[Ar] 3d^5 4s^1` is more stable (lower energy) than `[Ar] 3d^4 4s^2` because the half-filled d subshell (3d^5) results in a more stable arrangement than having one less electron in the d subshell and two in the s subshell. 5. **Conclusion**: - Therefore, the assertion (A) that the electronic configuration of Cr is `[Ar] 3d^5 4s^1` is true, and the reason (R) that this configuration is more stable (lower energy) due to the half-filled d subshell is also true. Thus, both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A. ### Final Answer: Both the assertion (A) and the reason (R) are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Outer electronic configuration of Cu is ul(3d^9) ul (4s^2) .

the configuration [Ar]3d^(10)4s^(2)4p^(4) is similar to that of :

The electronic configuration of valence shell of Cu is 3d^(10)4s^(1) and not 3d^(9)4s^(2) . How is this configuration explained?

Why does chromium have configuration of type 3d^(5) 4s^(1) instead of 3d^(4) 4s^(2) ?

Element with electronic configuration as [Ar]^(18)3d^(5)4s^(2) is placed in :

The outermost shell electronic configuration 3d^(5), 4s^(2) represents

Statement-1 : The groundstate configuration of Cr is [Ar] 3d^(5) 4s^(1) Statement-2 : The energy of atom is lesser in 3d^(5)4s^(1) configuration compared to 3d^(4)4s^(2) configuration.

The outer electronic configuration of the ground state chromium atom is 3d^(4),4s^(2)

The outer electronic configuration of the ground state chromium atom is 3d^(2),4s^(2) .

The element with the electronic configuration [Xe]^(54) 4f^(14)5d^(1)6s^(2) is a