Read the given statements and select the correct option.
Statement 1: Biomedical wastes are disposed off by incineration.
Statement 2: Landfills are usually present outside the city so that the rotting garbage does not pollute land or water.

Options

A. Both statements 1 and 2 are true and statement 2 is the correct explanation of statement 1.
B. Both statements 1 and 2 are true but statement 2 is not the correct explanation of statement 1.
C. Statement 1 is true but statement 2 is false.
D. Both statements 1 and 2 are false.

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze both statements provided:

### Step 1: Evaluate Statement 1
**Statement 1:** "Biomedical wastes are disposed of by incineration."

- **Explanation:** Biomedical waste includes items like syringes, infected needles, and other materials that can be hazardous to health. The proper method to dispose of such waste is through incineration, which involves burning the waste at high temperatures to ensure that harmful pathogens are destroyed. Therefore, this statement is **true**.

### Step 2: Evaluate Statement 2
**Statement 2:** "Landfills are usually present outside the city so that the rotting garbage does not pollute land or water."

- **Explanation:** Landfills are indeed often located outside of cities to minimize the impact of waste on urban areas. However, the statement implies that this placement completely prevents pollution, which is not entirely accurate. Landfills can still lead to leachate, which is a liquid that can contaminate groundwater and soil. While the intention of placing landfills outside cities is to reduce pollution, it does not eliminate the risk of pollution entirely. Therefore, this statement is **partially true** but misleading in its implication.

### Conclusion
- **Final Assessment:** Statement 1 is true, and Statement 2 is true but misleading. Thus, both statements are correct in their own right, but Statement 2 does not adequately explain Statement 1.

### Correct Option
The correct option is that both statements are true, but Statement 2 is not the correct explanation of Statement 1.

---