Statement 1: When an electric current flows through a wire, it behaves like a magnet.
Statement 2: A current carrying coil of an insulated wire wrapped around an iron nail forms an electromagnet.

Options

A. Both statements 1 and 2 are true and statement 2 is the correct explanation of statement 1.
B. Both statements 1 and 2 are true but statement 2 is not the correct explanation of statement 1.
C. Statement 1 is true but statement 2 is false.
D. Both statements 1 and 2 are false.

Explanation

To analyze the statements provided in the question, we will break down each statement and evaluate their validity.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding Statement 1**:
- The first statement claims that "When an electric current flows through a wire, it behaves like a magnet."
- This statement is true. When an electric current passes through a conductor (like a wire), it generates a magnetic field around it. This phenomenon is a fundamental principle of electromagnetism.

2. **Understanding Statement 2**:
- The second statement asserts that "A current-carrying coil of an insulated wire wrapped around an iron nail forms an electromagnet."
- This statement is also true. When a coil of wire (which carries an electric current) is wrapped around a ferromagnetic material (like an iron nail), the magnetic field produced by the coil magnetizes the iron nail, thus forming an electromagnet.

3. **Evaluating the Relationship Between the Statements**:
- Statement 1 describes a general principle of electromagnetism, while Statement 2 provides a specific example of how that principle can be applied (creating an electromagnet).
- While both statements are true, Statement 2 does not serve as an explanation for Statement 1; rather, it illustrates a practical application of the concept described in Statement 1.

4. **Conclusion**:
- Both statements are true, but Statement 2 is not the correct explanation of Statement 1. They are related but distinct statements.

### Final Answer:
Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are true, but Statement 2 is not the correct explanation of Statement 1.

---