हवाई जहाज के बारे में 10 अनोखे तथ्य | Facts About Aeroplane In Hindi | Airplane Facts | #shorts

The ratio in the speeds of two aeroplanes is 7 : 15. If the first aeroplane covers a distance of 1050 km in 3 hours, then what is the speed of the second aeroplane ? दो हवाई जहाजों की गतियों का अनुपात 7 : 15 है | यदि पहला हवाई जहाज 3 घंटों में 1050 km की दूरी तय करता है, तो दूसरे हवाई जहाज की गति कितनी है ?

In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and IL You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement : I. We are going back again to our ancestors and finding out the importance of Yoga and Pranayam. II. People in west have already opted it. It does not require any external equipment but only body and soul. , Conclusions : I. Ancient science is treasure of many cures and natural remedies of various diseases. II. Technology has overshadowed these ancient sources and introduced new concepts of fitness called gym. / निम्नलिखित प्रश्न में, दो कथन दिए गए हैं जिनके आगे दो निष्कर्ष I और II निकाले गए हैं। आपको मानना है कि कथन सत्य है चाहे वे सामान्यतः ज्ञात तथ्यों से भिन्न प्रतीत होते हों। आपको निर्णय करना है कि दिए गए निष्कर्षों में से कौन-सा निश्चित रूप से कथनों द्वारा सही निकाला जा सकता है/सकते हैं, यदि कोई हो। कथनः I. हम फिर से अपने पूर्वजों की ओर लौट रहे हैं और योग तथा प्राणायाम के महत्व को समझ रहे हैं। II. पश्चिम के लोगों ने इसे पहले से ही अपना रखा है। इसके लिए किसी बाहरी उपकरण की जरूरत नहीं है, केवल आत्मा और शरीर चाहिए। निष्कर्ष : I. प्राचीन विज्ञान कई इलाजों का खजाना और विभिन्न रोगों का प्राकृतिक उपचार है। II. प्रौद्योगिकी ने इन प्राचीन स्रोतों को दबा दिया है और स्वस्थ रहने के लिए नई अवधारणा को जन्म दिया है जिसे जिम कहते हैं।

The ratio in the speeds of two aeroplanes is 11 : 18. If the first covers a distance of 1650 Km in 3 hours, then find the speed of the second one (in m/s ). दो हवाई जहाज़ों की गतियों का अनुपात 11:18 है | यदि पहला हवाई जहाज 3 घंटों में 1650 km की दूरी तय करता है, तो दूसरे हवाई जहाज की गति (m/s में) कितनी है?

Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives. Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything 'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I, or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar to the understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken in India. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is in their own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape, cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared to that of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? The onus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? According to the writer the responsibility of explaining the facts about India to Europeans rests with?