Assertion : Light converges on a virtual object.
Reason : Virtual object is always behind a mirror.

Options

A. (a) If both Assertion and Reason are true and the Reason is correct explanation of the Assertion.
B. (b) If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion.
C. (c) If Assertion is true, but the Reason is false.
D. (d) If Assertion is false but the Reason is true.

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
The assertion states that "Light converges on a virtual object."

- In optics, a virtual object is an object from which light appears to diverge, but does not actually converge. However, in the context of mirrors, when we look at the image formed by a concave mirror, the light rays seem to converge at a point behind the mirror, which is perceived as a virtual object.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states that "Virtual object is always behind a mirror."

- This is true because a virtual object is formed when the light rays diverge from a point behind the mirror. In the case of a concave mirror, the virtual object is indeed located behind the mirror, and this is a characteristic of virtual objects in mirror optics.

### Step 3: Determine the Relationship
Now we need to check if the reason correctly explains the assertion.

- Since the assertion is true (light converges on a virtual object in the context of mirrors) and the reason is also true (the virtual object is always behind a mirror), we can conclude that the reason is a correct explanation of the assertion.

### Conclusion
Both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason provides a correct explanation for the assertion.

### Final Answer
- Assertion: True
- Reason: True
- The reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

---