A laboratory blood test is 99% effective in detecting a certain
disease when it is in fact, present. However, the test also yields a false
positive result for 0.5% of the healthy person tested (i.e. if a healthy
person is tested, then, with proba
Text Solution
Verified by Experts
Let `E_(1) and E_(2)` be the respective events that a person has a disease and a person has no disease. Since `E_(1) and E_(2)` are events complimentary to each other, we have `P(E_(2))=1-P(E_(1))=1-0.001=0.999` Let A be the event that the blood test result is positive. `P(A//E_(1))` =P (result is positive given the person has disease) `=99%=0.99` `P(A//E_(1))=P` (result is positive given that the person has no disease) `=0.5%=0.005.` Probability that a person has a disease, given that his test result is positive, is given by `P(E_(1)|A).` By using Bayes' theorem, we obtain `P(E_(1)//A)=(P(E_(1)).P(A//E_(1)))/(P(E_(1)).P(A\\E_(1))+P(E_(2)).P(A\\E_(2)))` `=(0.001xx0.99)/(0.001xx0.99+0.999xx0.005)` `=(0.00099)/(0.005985)=22/133`
CENGAGE|Exercise ARCHIVES (MATRIX MATCH TYPE )|1 Videos
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems
A test for detection of a particular disease is not fool proof. The test will correctly detect the disease 90% of the time, but will incorrectly detect the disease 1% of the time. For a large population of which an estimated 0.2% have the disease, a person is selected at random, given the test, and tod that he has the disease. What are the chances that the person actually have the disease?