In a Geiger-Marsden experiment, what is the distance of closest approach to the nucleus of a 7.7 MeV a-particle before it comes momentarily to rest and reverses its direction?

Explanation

The key idea here is that throughout the scattering process, the total mechanical energy of the system consisting of an a-particle and a gold nucleus is conserved. The system’s initial mechanical energy is `E_i`, before the particle and nucleus interact, and it is equal to its mechanical energy `E_f` when the a-particle momentarily stops. The initial energy `E_i` is just the kinetic energy K of the incoming a- particle. The final energy `E_f` is just the electric potential energy U of the system. The potential energy U can be calculated from Eq.
Let d be the centre-to- centre distance between the a-particle and the gold nucleus when the a- article is at its stopping point. Then we can write the conservation of energy `E_i = E_f` as
`K = 1/(4 pi epsilon_0) ((2e)(Ze))/(d) = (2 Ze^2)/(4 pi epsilon_0 d)`
Thus the distance of closest approach d is given by
`d = (2 Z e^2)/(4 pi epsilon_0 K)`
The miximum kinetic energy found in `alpha`- particles of natural origin is `7.7 MeV` or `1.2 xx 10^(-12) J`. Since `1//4 pi epsilon_0 = 9.0 xx 10^(9) N m^2//C^2`. Therefore with `e = 1.6 xx 10^(-19) C`, we have
`d = ((2)(9.0 xx 10^(9) Nm^2//C^2)(1.6 xx 10^(-10)C)^2 Z)/(1.2 xx 10^(-12) J)`
`= 3.84 xx 10^(-16) Z m`.
The atomic number of foil material gold is `Z = 79`, so that `d (Au) = 3.0 xx 10^(-14) m = 30 fm`. (1 fm (i.e. fermi) = `10^(-15) m`.)
The radius of gold nucleus is, therefore, less than `3.0 × 10^(-14)` m. This is not in very good agreement with the observed result as the actual radius of gold nucleus is 6 fm. The cause of discrepancy is that the distance of closest approach is considerably larger than the sum of the radii of the gold nucleus and the a-particle. Thus, the `alpha`-particle reverses its motion without ever actually touching the gold nucleus.