Home
Class 12
MATHS
Statements (p to q) harr (q to p)...

Statements `(p to q) harr (q to p)`

A

is contradiction

B

is tautology

C

is neither contradiction not tautology

D

None of these

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the statement \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \), we need to analyze the truth values of both implications and their equivalence. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Implications**: - The implication \( p \to q \) is true in all cases except when \( p \) is true and \( q \) is false. - The implication \( q \to p \) is true in all cases except when \( q \) is true and \( p \) is false. 2. **Constructing the Truth Table**: We will create a truth table for \( p \) and \( q \) to evaluate \( (p \to q) \) and \( (q \to p) \). | \( p \) | \( q \) | \( p \to q \) | \( q \to p \) | \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) | |---------|---------|----------------|----------------|-------------------------------------------| | T | T | T | T | T | | T | F | F | T | F | | F | T | T | F | F | | F | F | T | T | T | 3. **Evaluating the Truth Table**: - For \( p = T \) and \( q = T \): \( (p \to q) \) is T, \( (q \to p) \) is T, so \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) is T. - For \( p = T \) and \( q = F \): \( (p \to q) \) is F, \( (q \to p) \) is T, so \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) is F. - For \( p = F \) and \( q = T \): \( (p \to q) \) is T, \( (q \to p) \) is F, so \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) is F. - For \( p = F \) and \( q = F \): \( (p \to q) \) is T, \( (q \to p) \) is T, so \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) is T. 4. **Conclusion**: - The final column shows that the expression \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) is true for the combinations \( (T, T) \) and \( (F, F) \), but false for \( (T, F) \) and \( (F, T) \). - Since the expression is not always true (it is false in some cases), it is neither a tautology nor a contradiction. ### Final Answer: The statement \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \) is **neither a tautology nor a contradiction**.

To solve the statement \( (p \to q) \leftrightarrow (q \to p) \), we need to analyze the truth values of both implications and their equivalence. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Implications**: - The implication \( p \to q \) is true in all cases except when \( p \) is true and \( q \) is false. - The implication \( q \to p \) is true in all cases except when \( q \) is true and \( p \) is false. ...
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • MATHMETICAL REASONING

    CENGAGE ENGLISH|Exercise Archives|10 Videos
  • MATHMETICAL REASONING

    CENGAGE ENGLISH|Exercise concept application|13 Videos
  • LOGARITHM AND ITS PROPERTIES

    CENGAGE ENGLISH|Exercise JEE ADVANCED|1 Videos
  • MATRICES

    CENGAGE ENGLISH|Exercise Single correct Answer|34 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Consider : Statement I: (p^^~q)^^(~p^^q) is a fallacy Statement II: (ptoq)harr(~q to ~p) is a tautology

The logical statement (p to q) vv (q to ~ p) is :

In the truth table for the statements ( p to q) harr(~p vvq) , the last column has the truth value in the following order

The following statement (p to q) to [(~p to q) to q] is

Let p and q be any two propositons Statement 1 : (p rarr q) harr q vv ~p is a tautology Statement 2 : ~(~p ^^ q) ^^ (p vv q) harr p is fallacy

Write down the truth tables for the following statements : ( p ^^ q) Rightarrow ~p " " (ii) ( p ^^ q) Rightarrow ( p vee q)

When does the value of the statement (p ^^ r) harr ( r ^^ q) become false ?

If p and q are logical statements, then p rArr (~q rArr p) is equivalent to

The statement ~(p ^^ q) vv q

Let p, q and r be three statements, then (~p to q) to r is equivalent to